LIU CHENG CHAN

LIU CHENG CHAN is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 12 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 60.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

LIU CHENG CHAN has been represented by 2 law firms and 12 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of LIU CHENG CHAN's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
5.4
Complex Cases
3 (60.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost25.0 parties avg
Partial17.0 parties avg
Won25.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201817.0 parties avg
201717.0 parties avg
201617.0 parties avg
201513.0 parties avg
201413.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of LIU CHENG CHAN's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost2(40.0%)
Partial1(20.0%)
Won2(40.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD180,666.673 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20181
1
20171
1
20161
1
20151
1
20141
1

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
16 Jan 2018
Appellant, Respondent, DefendantPartialAppeal dismissed in part and allowed in part. Account of profits is available against a fiduciary who procures an unlawful benefit for a corporate vehicle in which he has a substantial interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24 Apr 2017
DefendantLostLiable for 90% of the plaintiff’s costs, amounting to $540,000. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
30 Mar 2016
DefendantWonCosts fixed at $2000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the first defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12 Apr 2015
DefendantWonDefendant's application to vary the Mareva injunction was allowed.
20 Nov 2014
DefendantLostFreezing order granted against the defendant.