Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Mareva Injunction & Fiduciary Duty
In Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Liu Cheng Chan and others, the High Court of Singapore heard applications related to a Mareva injunction. Parakou Shipping, a shipping company in liquidation, sued its former directors (Liu Cheng Chan and others) for breach of fiduciary duties. The plaintiff sought to increase the limit of a Mareva injunction to include the defendants' shareholding in a company, alleging asset dissipation through corporate restructuring. The defendants applied to set aside or vary the original Mareva injunction, arguing that their assets were sufficient to meet the plaintiff's claim. The court dismissed the plaintiff's application and allowed the defendants' applications, finding the defendants' identified assets sufficient to cover the claim, while reserving costs to the trial judge.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Plaintiff's application to increase the Mareva injunction is dismissed, and the defendants' applications to vary the Mareva injunction are allowed.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Shipping company Parakou Shipping sought to increase a Mareva injunction against former directors for alleged breach of fiduciary duties. The court dismissed the application.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Others | Defendant | Corporation | Application Allowed | Won | |
PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) | Plaintiff | Corporation | Application Dismissed | Lost | |
LIU CHENG CHAN | Defendant | Individual | Application Allowed | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | J | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Parakou Shipping is a shipping company that went into liquidation.
- The first and second defendants used to be directors of Parakou Shipping.
- The third and fourth defendants took over Parakou Shipping from the first and second defendants on 22 December 2008.
- The fifth and sixth defendants are companies owned by the first, second, and third defendants.
- The plaintiff claims the defendants breached their fiduciary duties, causing loss and damage.
- The plaintiff claims the defendants are liable to account for loss of profits from the sale of vessels and transfer of ship management agreements.
- The defendants' shareholding in the sixth defendant was transferred to Parakou Tankers Inc for no consideration.
5. Formal Citations
- Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Liu Cheng Chan and others, Suit No 434 of 2014 (Summons Nos 6150, 6151, 6152 of 2014 and 1482 of 2015), [2015] SGHC 96
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Third and fourth defendants took over the plaintiff from the first and second defendants. | |
Court granted the plaintiff’s application for a Mareva injunction order over the defendants’ assets. | |
Court granted a stay of the Order. | |
Defendants applied for a variation of the Order. | |
Plaintiff applied to increase the limit of the Mareva injunction. | |
Decision date. |
7. Legal Issues
- Mareva Injunction
- Outcome: The court found that the defendants had provided adequate security and dismissed the plaintiff's application to increase the limit of the Mareva injunction.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Dissipation of assets
- Adequacy of security
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty
- Outcome: The court did not make a determination on the merits of the breach of fiduciary duty claim, as it was an interlocutory application.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Loss and damage to the plaintiff
- Account of profits
8. Remedies Sought
- Mareva Injunction
- Account of Profits
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
- Insolvency Law
11. Industries
- Shipping
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parakou Shipping Pte Ltd v Liu Cheng Chan and others | High Court | Yes | [2014] SGHC 244 | Singapore | Cited as the case in which the initial Mareva injunction was granted. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Mareva injunction
- Fiduciary duty
- Liquidation
- Ship management agreements
- Dissipation of assets
- Corporate restructuring
15.2 Keywords
- Mareva injunction
- fiduciary duty
- shipping
- liquidation
- Singapore
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Liquidation | 80 |
Fiduciary Duties | 70 |
Injunctions | 60 |
Shipping Law | 60 |
Ship Management Agreements | 50 |
Commercial Litigation | 50 |
Corporate Law | 40 |
Bankruptcy | 40 |
Breach of Contract | 30 |
Contract Law | 30 |
Banking and Finance | 30 |
16. Subjects
- Insolvency
- Shipping
- Fiduciary Duty
- Civil Procedure