Ng Jia En

Ng Jia En is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and director's duties. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ng Jia En has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Tracing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mashed Potato Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Marriage Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ng Jia En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ng Jia En has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	TYN Investment Group v ERC Holdings: Mareva Injunction & Arbitration Act(Jul 2020) Zolton Techs v Tan Chew Sim: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Business Opportunity Diversion(Jul 2018) Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Amendment of Pleadings and Fiduciary Duty(Mar 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ng Jia En's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ng Jia En's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,697,143.32	1,348,571.662 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	TYN Investment Group v ERC Holdings: Mareva Injunction & Arbitration Act 27 Jul 2020 ERC Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Jul 2020	ERC Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Mareva Injunction Granted AgainstMareva injunction granted against the first defendant up to the limit of $2,693,143.32 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Zolton Techs v Tan Chew Sim: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Business Opportunity Diversion 10 Jul 2018 Chow Hoo Siong (Third Party)Neutral	10 Jul 2018	Chow Hoo Siong (Third Party): N/AThird party was involved in the indemnity sought by the defendant.
3	Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Amendment of Pleadings and Fiduciary Duty 30 Mar 2016 CHIK SAU KAM (Defendant)Won	30 Mar 2016	CHIK SAU KAM (Defendant): Costs awardedCosts fixed at $2000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the second defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.