Scope of Works
Scope of Works is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 11 cases from 2013 to 2023.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Scope of Works, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
TSMP Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
Zenith Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
Mallal & Namazie50.00% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Infinitus Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Tito Isaac & Co LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Luo Ling Ling LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Central Chambers Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Selvam LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Scope of Works, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Namazie Mirza Mohamed50.00% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
Kris Chew Yee Fong0.00% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
Chan Kah Keen Melvin0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen100.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Jasmine Thng Khai Fang0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Luis Inaki Duhart Gonzalez100.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Simone Bamapriya Chettiar0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Twang Kern Zern0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Luo Ling Ling0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Ker Yanguang100.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 11 most recent judgments out of 11 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Diamond Glass v Zhong Kai: Liquidated Damages, Variations & Building Law | Appellate Division of the High Court | 30 May 2023 | Appeals allowed in part; supplementary orders made regarding costs and payments. |
2 | Vim Engineering v Deluge Fire Protection: Construction Contract Dispute over Variation Works and Back-Charges | Appellate Division of the High Court | 11 Jan 2023 | Appeal Allowed in Part |
3 | Presscrete Engineering v SsangYong-Wai Fong: Stay of Proceedings for Arbitration | General Division of the High Court | 09 Jan 2023 | Appeal Allowed |
4 | Zhong Kai Construction v Diamond Glass: Liquidated Damages & SOPA Dispute | General Division of the High Court | 01 Dec 2021 | Plaintiff's claims for liquidated damages and replacement/rectification works allowed in part; three variation orders in the adjudication determination set aside; one of the defendant's claim for variation order allowed; defendant's other claims dismissed. |
5 | Vim Engineering v Deluge Fire Protection: Variation Claims & Written Instructions | General Division of the High Court | 21 Mar 2021 | Judgment for Defendant |
6 | Comfort Management v OGSP Engineering: Building Contract Dispute over Lump Sum Contract and Sub-contractor Claims | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 05 Aug 2020 | Judgment for Plaintiff in part and Judgment for First Defendant in part; Plaintiff's claim against Second Defendant dismissed. |
7 | Yew San Construction v Ley Choon: Subcontract Dispute over Earthworks and Liquidated Damages | High Court | 04 Dec 2019 | Judgment for Defendant on Counterclaim. |
8 | Global Switch v Arup: Design Contract Dispute over Data Center Cooling & Power | High Court | 09 May 2019 | Judgment for Defendant |
9 | Wei Siang v Euro Assets: Building Renovation, Conservation Guidelines & Negligence | High Court of Singapore | 22 Aug 2018 | Judgment for Plaintiff on claim in respect of variation works done to install an additional rainwater drop pipe. All of the contractor’s remaining claims against the owner are dismissed. The contractor, the architect, and the engineer are all liable to the owner in respect of the deviations to: (i) the second and third storey rear slabs; (ii) the rear roof slab; and (iii) the rear external staircase; (b) The contractor and the architect, but not the engineer, are liable to the owner for the deviation at the rear boundary wall. The quantum of damages payable to the owner by these three parties will be assessed separately. As against the owner, however, the three parties are jointly and severally liable for the whole of the owner’s loss. |
10 | Geocon Piling v Multistar: Construction Subcontract Dispute over KPE Bored Piling Works | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 30 Oct 2016 | Judgment for Plaintiff in part. |
11 | Ho Pak Kim Realty v Revitech: Construction Dispute over Kovan Primera Condominium | High Court | 18 Feb 2013 | Defendant's appeal allowed in part; Plaintiff's appeal dismissed. |