Tito Isaac

Tito Isaac is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and criminal law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tito Isaac has demonstrated expertise across 69 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Scheme of Arrangement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Secrets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scope of Works	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
False Imprisonment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defective Works	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rectification Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Industrial Accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tito Isaac has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tito Isaac has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tito Isaac & Co LLP	9 cases	75% of cases	Ishan Anoop Sakraney v Ameet Nalin Parikh: Contractual Interpretation and Fee Entitlement Dispute(Sep 2021) Public Prosecutor v Azahari bin Ahmad: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act(May 2016) Vasentha v PP: Trafficking, Diamorphine, Sentencing Principles(Jul 2015)
Tito Isaac & Co	1 cases	8% of cases	Asia Business Forum v. Long Ai Sin: Employee Duties & Confidentiality(Aug 2003)
Tito Isaac and Co	1 cases	8% of cases	Tay Way Bock v Yeunh Oi Siong: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Contract(Feb 2006)
Naidu Mohan & Theseira	1 cases	8% of cases	Lasry Lex QC v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission & Res Judicata in Capital Offense Case(Nov 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tito Isaac's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Lost	72.1 parties avg	2.1	58%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Won	36.3 parties avg	6.3	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tito Isaac's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(8%)	8%
Lost	7(58%)	58%
Partial	1(8%)	8%
Won	3(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ishan Anoop Sakraney v Ameet Nalin Parikh: Contractual Interpretation and Fee Entitlement Dispute 20 Sep 2021 Ishan Anoop Sakraney (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	20 Sep 2021	Ishan Anoop Sakraney (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $40,000 awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Public Prosecutor v Azahari bin Ahmad: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 22 May 2016 Azahari bin Ahmad (Defendant)Lost	22 May 2016	Azahari bin Ahmad (Defendant): Convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment and caningThe First Accused was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to life imprisonment with the mandatory minimum caning of 15 strokes.
3	Vasentha v PP: Trafficking, Diamorphine, Sentencing Principles 28 Jul 2015 Vasentha d/o Joseph (Appellant)Won	28 Jul 2015	Vasentha d/o Joseph (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence of imprisonment was reduced to a term of 8 years.
4	Ho Pak Kim Realty v Revitech: Construction Dispute over Kovan Primera Condominium 18 Feb 2013 Revitech Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	18 Feb 2013	Revitech Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartDefendant's appeal was allowed in part, with increased damages awarded for back-charges, rectification costs, and failure to furnish warranties.
5	Kim Gwang Seok v Public Prosecutor: Video-Link Testimony for Overseas Witnesses in Drug Export Conspiracy Case 08 Mar 2012 Kim Gwang Seok (Applicant)Lost	08 Mar 2012	Kim Gwang Seok (Applicant): Motion DismissedThe applicant's motion to allow witnesses to testify via video-link was dismissed.
6	SAAG Oilfield v Shaik Abu Bakar: Scheme of Arrangement & Extinguishment of Tort Claims 29 Jan 2012 SAAG Oilfield Engineering (S) Pte Ltd (formerly known as Derrick Services Singapore Pte Ltd) (Appellant)Won	29 Jan 2012	SAAG Oilfield Engineering (S) Pte Ltd (formerly known as Derrick Services Singapore Pte Ltd) (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeals allowed. No order as to costs here and below.
7	Azman v Saag Oilfield: Scheme of Arrangement & Extinguishment of Tort Claims 01 Aug 2011 SAAG Oilfield Engineering (S) Pte Ltd (formerly known as Derrick Services Singapore Pte Ltd) (Defendant)Lost	01 Aug 2011	SAAG Oilfield Engineering (S) Pte Ltd (formerly known as Derrick Services Singapore Pte Ltd) (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantDefendant's argument that the Plaintiff's causes of action have been extinguished and/or barred and/or precluded from being maintained was rejected.
8	Amutha Valli v Redemptorist Fathers: Tort Claims for Assault, False Imprisonment & Negligence in Alleged Exorcism 12 Feb 2009 Simon Tan Hon Lip (Defendant)Won	12 Feb 2009	Simon Tan Hon Lip (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe plaintiff's claim against the second defendant was dismissed.
9	Lim Chen Yeow Kelvin v Goh Chin Peng: Resulting Trusts & Joint Accounts 29 Jul 2008 Lim Chen Yeow Kelvin (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Jul 2008	Lim Chen Yeow Kelvin (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs to be taxed or agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Tay Way Bock v Yeunh Oi Siong: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Contract 01 Feb 2006 Tay Way Bock (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Feb 2006	Tay Way Bock (Plaintiff): Application to stay proceedings grantedThe plaintiff's claim will be heard in Malaysia.
11	Lasry Lex QC v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission & Res Judicata in Capital Offense Case 19 Nov 2003 Lex Lasry (Applicant)Lost	19 Nov 2003	Lex Lasry (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for ad hoc admission was dismissed.
12	Asia Business Forum v. Long Ai Sin: Employee Duties & Confidentiality 27 Aug 2003 Asia Business Forum Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	27 Aug 2003	Asia Business Forum Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's action was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.