Compulsory Acquisition
Compulsory Acquisition is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 11 cases from 2001 to 2020.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Compulsory Acquisition, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Attorney-General’s Chambers77.78% success rate | 9 cases81.8% of area |
Allen & Gledhill LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Lee & Lee100.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Cavenagh Law LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Clifford Chance Pte Ltd0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Withers KhattarWong LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Pinnacle Law LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
A C Syed & Partners0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
AC Syed & Partners0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Compulsory Acquisition, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Khoo Boo Jin37.50% success rate | 4 cases36.4% of area |
Tang Shangjun25.00% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
Eric Chin100.00% success rate | 2 cases18.2% of area |
Suang Wijaya0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Krishna Elan0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Nish Kumar Shetty0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Ang Cheng Hock0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Vikram Nair0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Fu Qijing0.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Jeyendran s/o Jeyapal100.00% success rate | 1 cases9.1% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 11 most recent judgments out of 11 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Management Corporation v Aikyu Trading: Access to Settlement Documents under BMSMA | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 07 Oct 2020 | Appeal Dismissed |
2 | YCH Distripark Pte Ltd v Collector of Land Revenue: Compulsory Land Acquisition & Compensation | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 13 Jul 2020 | Civil Appeal No 130 of 2019 and Civil Appeal Summons No 36 of 2020 dismissed. |
3 | Fauziyah v Singapore Land Authority: Striking Out, Appeal, Adducing Fresh Evidence, Compulsory Acquisition, Interest in Land, State Land, Muslim Law, Charitable Trusts | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 16 Jun 2020 | Appeal against the assistant registrar’s decision to strike out the Title Claim is allowed. The Plaintiff is allowed to amend the Statement of Claim based on the Proposed Statement of Claim. The assistant registrar’s decision to strike out the Acquisition Challenge Claim is upheld. |
4 | Ahmad Kasim v Moona Esmail: Adverse Possession, Land Acquisition & Compensation | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 09 Apr 2019 | Appeal allowed in part. |
5 | Ahmad Kasim v Moona Esmail: Adverse Possession & Land Acquisition Act Dispute | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 12 Feb 2017 | Originating Summons dismissed with costs to be paid by the applicant to the third and fourth respondents. |
6 | Novelty Dept Store v Collector of Land Revenue: Compulsory Land Acquisition & Compensation | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 10 Mar 2016 | Appeal Dismissed in Substance |
7 | Per Ah Seng Robin v HDB: HDB Flat Compulsory Acquisition for Unauthorized Subletting | Court of Appeal | 29 Nov 2015 | Appeal Dismissed |
8 | ORG Powell Packaging v Liten Logistics: Option to Purchase Dispute After Compulsory Land Acquisition | High Court | 28 Oct 2012 | Originating Summons allowed in part. |
9 | Eng Foong Ho v Attorney-General: Constitutional Challenge to Temple Land Acquisition | High Court | 08 May 2008 | Application dismissed with costs. |
10 | Teng Fuh Holdings v Collector of Land Revenue: Land Acquisition & Public Purpose | High Court | 15 Jun 2006 | Application dismissed with costs. |
11 | Collector of Land Revenue v Heng Long Investment: Interpretation of 'Amount Awarded' under Land Acquisition Act | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 21 Jun 2001 | Appeal Allowed |