Ancillary disclosure order

Ancillary disclosure order is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 8 cases from 2003 to 2021.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Ancillary disclosure order, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate2 cases25.0% of area
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Tito Isaac & Co LLP0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
CLASIS LLC100.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Harry Elias Partnership100.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Tan Peng Chin LLC0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
KhattarWong LLP0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
David Nayar and Vardan0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Deputy Public Prosecutor0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Rodyk & Davidson100.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Ancillary disclosure order, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Prakash Pillai8.33% success rate2 cases25.0% of area
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate2 cases25.0% of area
Isaac Tito Shane0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Gregory Vijayendran0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Oommen Mathew0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Koh Junxiang100.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Sunil Sudheesan100.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Kronenburg Edmund Jerome0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 8 most recent judgments out of 8 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Parikh v Sakraney: Interpretation of Contractual Terms for Payment of FeesGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore01 Mar 2021
Judgment for Plaintiff
2Ramesh v AXA Life: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Employer ReferencesCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore26 Jul 2016
Appeal Allowed in Part
3-20 Aug 2015
Unknown
4World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & DefamationHigh Court09 Apr 2013
Appeal allowed in part. The defendant had to answer interrogatories nos 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1.
5Navigator Investment Services Ltd v Acclaim Insurance Brokers: Arbitration Stay & Pre-Action DiscoveryCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore28 Sep 2009
Appeal against the decision in Summons 5059 allowed, but appeal against the decision in Registrar’s Appeal 383 dismissed.
6Tan Kay Beng v PP: Theft & Criminal Intimidation Sentencing AppealHigh Court06 Jul 2006
Appeal Allowed
7Tan Yeow Hiang Kenneth v Tan Chor Chuan: Review of Costs in Defamation ActionHigh Court09 Nov 2005
The court decided that it did not have the power to allow a further reduction on account of the failed defenses. The court also decided that, even if it were open to it to grant a reduction, no reduction ought to be allowed.
8Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non ConveniensHigh Court07 Feb 2003
Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed.