Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz

Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and contractual terms. Their track record shows a 63.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Liens	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Action in rem	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ancillary disclosure order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tito Isaac & Co LLP	4 cases	50% of cases	Fernandez v Woi: Breach of Agency & Fiduciary Duties in Nominee Director Arrangement(May 2021) Parikh v Sakraney: Interpretation of Contractual Terms for Payment of Fees(Mar 2021) Choo Ah Sam v Kieu Ka Tong: Contract Dispute over York Launch Service Shares(Mar 2020)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP	4 cases	50% of cases	Natixis v Seshadri Rajagopalan: Admiralty Actions, In Rem Writs, and Judicial Management under IRDA(May 2024) Lim Chee Seng v Phang Yew Kiat: Appeal on Total Failure of Consideration(Apr 2024) Cova Group v Advanced Submarine Networks: Security for Costs in Construction Equipment Rental Dispute(Jun 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 2 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	38%
Won	54.1 parties avg	4.1	63%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2023	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2024	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Koon Foong Adam Hariz's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Won	5(63%)	63%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,500.00	1,125.004 cases	4
USD	1,028,455.00	1,028,455.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Natixis v Seshadri Rajagopalan: Admiralty Actions, In Rem Writs, and Judicial Management under IRDA 01 May 2024 Nan Chiau Maritime (Pte) Ltd (in liquidation) (Defendant)Won	01 May 2024	Nan Chiau Maritime (Pte) Ltd (in liquidation) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; the plaintiffs’ applications are dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lim Chee Seng v Phang Yew Kiat: Appeal on Total Failure of Consideration 11 Apr 2024 Lim Chee Seng (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	11 Apr 2024	Lim Chee Seng (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the District Judge's decision was dismissed.
3	Cova Group v Advanced Submarine Networks: Security for Costs in Construction Equipment Rental Dispute 26 Jun 2023 Cova Group Holdings Ltd (Claimant, Appellant)Lost	26 Jun 2023	Cova Group Holdings Ltd (Claimant, Appellant): Appeals DismissedClaimant's appeals in RA 57, RA 58, RA 74 and RA 75 were dismissed.
4	Auto Lease v San Hup Bee: Third Party's Locus Standi & Breach of Contract 15 May 2023 San Hup Bee (S) Pte. Ltd (Respondent)Won	15 May 2023	San Hup Bee (S) Pte. Ltd (Respondent): Successful in resisting appealSuccessful in resisting appeal. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Fernandez v Woi: Breach of Agency & Fiduciary Duties in Nominee Director Arrangement 16 May 2021 Daniel Fernandez (Plaintiff)Won	16 May 2021	Daniel Fernandez (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the first defendant is ordered to return the amount of US$1,028,455.00 to the plaintiff, with interest at the rate of 5.33% from the date of the writ to the date of judgment. I order this sum to be paid to the plaintiff rather than the second defendant’s bank account because the custodial fiduciary breach did not arise out of the first defendant’s position as director of the second defendant, but out of her role as agent to the plaintiff, so the funds should be compensated to him. Assumed USD, as the judgment refers to USD amounts.
6	Parikh v Sakraney: Interpretation of Contractual Terms for Payment of Fees 01 Mar 2021 Ishan Anoop Sakraney (Defendant)Lost	01 Mar 2021	Ishan Anoop Sakraney (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court found in favor of the plaintiff's interpretation of the contract.
7	Choo Ah Sam v Kieu Ka Tong: Contract Dispute over York Launch Service Shares 29 Mar 2020 Kieu Kim Sen (Qiu Jinxing) (Defendant)Won	29 Mar 2020	Kieu Kim Sen (Qiu Jinxing) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found that the arrangement was a loan agreement and dismissed the plaintiff's claim.
8	Wen Wen Food Trading v Food Republic: Striking Out Claim for Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract 06 Mar 2019 Food Republic Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	06 Mar 2019	Food Republic Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Claim Struck OutClaim struck out; costs of $4,500.00, inclusive of disbursements, awarded against the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.