Kay Swee Pin

Kay Swee Pin is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 10 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 42.9% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Kay Swee Pin has been represented by 3 law firms and 10 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Damodara Ong LLC	1 case	Suresh s/o Damodara Ong Ziying Clement Khoo Shufen Joni
Damodara Hazra LLP	1 case	Suresh s/o Damodara Clement Ong Ziying Ong Ziying Clement Khoo Shufen Joni Joni Khoo Shufen
R. Ramason & Almenoar	3 cases	S H Almenoar Jeanne Wu Raji Ramason

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kay Swee Pin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	28.6%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	28.6%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	42.9%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kay Swee Pin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(28.6%)	28.6%
Partial	2(28.6%)	28.6%
Won	3(42.9%)	42.9%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	153,792.98	25,632.166 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2020-sgca-55 07 Jun 2020	07 Jun 2020	Respondent, Defendant	WonAppeal dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent in the amount of $45,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2019-sghc-223 19 Sep 2019	19 Sep 2019	Plaintiff	PartialJudgment for the Plaintiff for reimbursement of S$36,792.98 (Singapore Dollars, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2019-sghc-219 17 Sep 2019	17 Sep 2019	Defendant	WonThe court found that Kay Swee Pin is the legal and beneficial owner of the 799,999 NHPL shares.
4	2010-sghc-175 09 Jun 2010	09 Jun 2010	Plaintiff	LostKSP’s libel action fails and is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2008-sghc-143 28 Aug 2008	28 Aug 2008	Plaintiff	PartialDamages of $72,000 awarded for deprivation of membership rights and mental distress; claim for aggravated, exemplary, and punitive damages disallowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2008-sgca-11 11 Mar 2008	11 Mar 2008	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed with costs to the appellant. Suspension order declared invalid. Respondent to refund all sums paid by the appellant and awarded damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
7	2007-sghc-166 27 Sep 2007	27 Sep 2007	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's application for an order to revoke her suspension and for damages was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.