Clement Ong Ziying

Clement Ong Ziying is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in maintenance (child) and unjust enrichment. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trust law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trust Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Lasting Power of Attorney	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Compulsion	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Necessity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation Representative	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Indebtedness/Reimbursement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Clement Ong Ziying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Clement Ong Ziying has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Damodara Hazra LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	Kay Swee Pin v Ng Kong Yeam: Unjust Enrichment and Reimbursement for Taxes and Legal Fees(Sep 2019) Yugoimport SDPR v Westacre Investments: Garnishee Orders & Express Trusts Dispute(Aug 2016)
Damodara Ong LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	VTU v VTV: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Wife and Child Maintenance(Aug 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Clement Ong Ziying's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Clement Ong Ziying's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,565,917.73	1,282,958.872 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	VTU v VTV: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Wife and Child Maintenance 16 Aug 2022 VTV (Defendant)Partial	16 Aug 2022	VTV (Defendant): Division of Matrimonial AssetsEntitled to 50% of the total matrimonial assets valued at $5,058,249.50. The court ordered each party to retain assets under their own name, [EE] Tax, [EE] PLT and [Property A] Unit No. 3A to be given to the Husband, and the sale proceeds of the Matrimonial Home to be transferred to the Wife. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Kay Swee Pin v Ng Kong Yeam: Unjust Enrichment and Reimbursement for Taxes and Legal Fees 19 Sep 2019 Kay Swee Pin (Plaintiff)Partial	19 Sep 2019	Kay Swee Pin (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the Plaintiff for reimbursement of S$36,792.98 (Singapore Dollars, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Yugoimport SDPR v Westacre Investments: Garnishee Orders & Express Trusts Dispute 30 Aug 2016 Zrak-Teslic (Appellant, Respondent)Dismissed	30 Aug 2016	Zrak-Teslic (Appellant, Respondent): Claim DismissedClaim to beneficial ownership in the Funds was dismissed.