Shazana Anuar

Shazana Anuar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in wills and probate and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Shazana Anuar has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administration of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Paediatrics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvent Liquidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Preference	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Health Care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Shazana Anuar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Shazana Anuar has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	4 cases	67% of cases	Chia Foong Lin v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Doctor's Misdiagnosis of Kawasaki Disease(Jun 2017) Singapore Medical Council v Wong Him Choon: Professional Misconduct in Medical Practice(Jul 2016) Yang Chun v Yang Chia Yin: Estate Administration & Capacity to Execute Power of Attorney(Oct 2013)
Harry Elias Partnership	2 cases	33% of cases	Purcell v Singapore Flyer: Director's Removal and Inspection Rights under Companies Act(May 2010) Liquidators of Progen Engineering v Progen Holdings: Unfair Preference Claim(Dec 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shazana Anuar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shazana Anuar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	18,614,287.97	4,653,571.994 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chia Foong Lin v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Disciplinary Tribunal's Decision on Doctor's Misdiagnosis of Kawasaki Disease 26 Jun 2017 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	26 Jun 2017	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Decision UpheldThe Disciplinary Tribunal's decision against Dr. Chia was upheld.
2	Singapore Medical Council v Wong Him Choon: Professional Misconduct in Medical Practice 24 Jul 2016 Singapore Medical Council (Applicant)Won	24 Jul 2016	Singapore Medical Council (Applicant): Appeal AllowedThe Singapore Medical Council's appeal was allowed, and Dr. Wong was found guilty of the charge.
3	Yang Chun v Yang Chia Yin: Estate Administration & Capacity to Execute Power of Attorney 02 Oct 2013 Mrs Yang Chun née Sun Hui Min (Plaintiff)Partial	02 Oct 2013	Mrs Yang Chun née Sun Hui Min (Plaintiff): Interim orders grantedInterim orders were made for the defendant to pay $100,000 to the plaintiff’s solicitors to defray the plaintiff’s future medical expenses as well as reimburse Sun Chi Hao @ Yang Howard the sum of $52,202.53 incurred by him for the plaintiff’s medical expenses (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Chee Yoh Chuang v Progen Holdings: Unfair Preference, Directors' Duties & Insolvency 30 Aug 2010 Progen Holdings Ltd (Respondent)Lost	30 Aug 2010	Progen Holdings Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. The respondent is ordered to repay to the liquidators all monies required to settle debts to unrelated creditors (as well as professional fees) up to the sum of $18,514,287.97 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Purcell v Singapore Flyer: Director's Removal and Inspection Rights under Companies Act 20 May 2010 Purcell Peter Francis (Plaintiff)Lost	20 May 2010	Purcell Peter Francis (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application was dismissed with costs.
6	Liquidators of Progen Engineering v Progen Holdings: Unfair Preference Claim 22 Dec 2009 Progen Holdings Ltd (Defendant)Won	22 Dec 2009	Progen Holdings Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against Progen Holdings Ltd for unfair preference was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.