Singapore Medical Council v Wong Him Choon: Professional Misconduct in Medical Practice

The Singapore Medical Council appealed against the Disciplinary Tribunal's decision that Dr. Wong Him Choon was not guilty of professional misconduct under the Medical Registration Act. The High Court allowed the appeal, finding Dr. Wong guilty of failing to exercise due care in the management of a patient by inappropriately certifying the patient fit for light duties after surgery without ensuring adequate rest and rehabilitation conditions. The court emphasized the importance of ethical obligations in the medical profession and the need for doctors to prioritize patient welfare.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed

1.3 Case Type

Regulatory

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The Singapore High Court found Dr. Wong Him Choon guilty of professional misconduct for failing to provide adequate post-operative medical leave to a patient.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Sundaresh MenonChief JusticeNo
Chao Hick TinJustice of the Court of AppealNo
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJustice of AppealYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Dr. Wong certified a construction worker fit for light duties shortly after hand surgery.
  2. The patient was given only two days of medical leave after surgery.
  3. The patient later received medical leave from another hospital.
  4. The patient's employer did not pay him because he was not granted sufficient medical leave.
  5. Dr. Wong backdated a medical certificate after being informed the patient was not paid.
  6. Dr. Wong admitted he did not check if light duties were available.
  7. Dr. Wong assumed light duties were available based on past dealings with the employer.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Singapore Medical Council v Wong Him Choon, Originating Summons No 2 of 2015, [2016] SGHC 145

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Patient visited Raffles Hospital A&E after a fall
Dr. Wong performed surgery on the patient's right hand
Patient discharged from Raffles Hospital
Patient certified fit for light duties
Patient's post-operative review by Dr. Wong
Patient visited Changi General Hospital and received medical leave
Patient visited Raffles Hospital and was attended to by Dr. Andrew Dutton
Patient visited Changi General Hospital and received further medical leave
Complaint authorized by Mr. Jolovan Wham to the SMC
Dr. Wong issued the patient with a backdated medical certificate
Pins removed from patient's hand
Sutures removed from patient's hand
Patient's Work Permit expired
Patient returned to China
SMC issued Dr. Wong a Notice of Complaint
SMC informed Dr. Wong that a formal inquiry would be held by a DT
SMC sent Dr. Wong a Notice of Inquiry
Inquiry conducted by the DT
DT delivered its written decision
Hearing date
Decision date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Professional Misconduct
    • Outcome: The court found Dr. Wong guilty of professional misconduct.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to exercise due care
      • Inappropriate certification of fitness for work
      • Insufficient medical leave

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Disciplinary Action
  2. Suspension

9. Cause of Actions

  • Professional Misconduct

10. Practice Areas

  • Healthcare Regulation
  • Disciplinary Proceedings

11. Industries

  • Healthcare
  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical CouncilHigh CourtYes[2013] 3 SLR 900SingaporeCited for the principle that the practice of medicine is a calling of the highest order with ethical obligations.
Low Cze Hong v Singapore Medical CouncilHigh CourtYes[2008] 3 SLR(R) 612SingaporeCited for the definition of professional misconduct and the two limbs under which it can be established.
Ang Pek San Lawrence v Singapore Medical CouncilHigh CourtYes[2015] 1 SLR 436SingaporeCited for the findings the High Court must make before intervening in a DT decision and the elements required to prove professional misconduct.
Gobinathan Devathasan v Singapore Medical CouncilHigh CourtYes[2010] 2 SLR 926SingaporeCited for the principle that the court should be mindful that a DT has had the benefit of hearing oral evidence and is a specialist tribunal.
John Roylance v General Medical Council (No 2)Judicial Committee of the Privy CouncilYes[2000] 1 AC 311United KingdomCited for the importance of identifying a link between clinical misconduct and the profession of medicine to establish professional misconduct.
In re A SolicitorUnknownYes[1972] 1 WLR 869England and WalesCited for the principle that negligence may amount to professional misconduct if it is inexcusable and deplorable.
Pillai v Messiter (No 2)New South Wales Court of AppealYes(1989) 16 NSWLR 197AustraliaCited for the principle that departures from accepted standards could constitute professional misconduct.
Lee Kim Kwong v Singapore Medical CouncilHigh CourtYes[2014] 4 SLR 113SingaporeCited for the burden of proof on the SMC and the findings the DT must make before holding that the SMC has proven the charge.
Singapore Medical Council v Kwan Kah YeeHigh CourtYes[2015] 5 SLR 201SingaporeCited for the court's role to review a DT's decision on sentence and recalibrate sentences for certain types of misconduct.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Medical Registration Act (Cap 174)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Professional misconduct
  • Medical leave
  • Light duties
  • Standard of care
  • Disciplinary Tribunal
  • Medical Registration Act
  • Ethical obligations
  • Patient welfare
  • Supervised rest
  • Backdating medical certificate

15.2 Keywords

  • Medical profession
  • Professional conduct
  • Singapore Medical Council
  • Medical negligence
  • Medical ethics
  • Medical law
  • Medical registration act

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Medical Ethics
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Healthcare