Ng Yuen

Ng Yuen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and guarantee. Their track record shows a 53.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 8 complex cases, representing 53% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ng Yuen has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	10 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	9 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitrator's Fees	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Act 2020	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rental Relief	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defective Works	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ng Yuen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ng Yuen has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Malkin & Maxwell LLP	8 cases	53% of cases	JTC Corporation v Hot Spring Stone: Statutory Interpretation of COVID-19 Rental Relief Measures(Feb 2023) Ang Boon Tian v Jervois Pte Ltd: Summary Judgment and Interpretation of 'In Any Event' in Loan Guarantee(May 2022) AQU v AQV: Application to Set Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Jan 2015)
Ng & Koh	7 cases	47% of cases	Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai: Injunction for Arbitrator Fees Dispute(Nov 2008) Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai: Extension of Time for Appeal Legal Issue(Jun 2008) Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai Building Construction: Application for Extension of Time to Issue Arbitral Award(Apr 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ng Yuen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 8 (53%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.7 parties avg	3.7	20%
Neutral	24.0 parties avg	4.0	13%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	13%
Won	83.6 parties avg	3.6	53%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2008	44.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ng Yuen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(20%)	20%
Neutral	2(13%)	13%
Partial	2(13%)	13%
Won	8(53%)	53%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,887,826.40	240,652.2012 cases	12

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	4 121	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2009	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 15 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	JTC Corporation v Hot Spring Stone: Statutory Interpretation of COVID-19 Rental Relief Measures 15 Feb 2023 Hot Spring Stone Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	15 Feb 2023	Hot Spring Stone Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedHot Spring's counterclaim for two months of rental relief was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ang Boon Tian v Jervois Pte Ltd: Summary Judgment and Interpretation of 'In Any Event' in Loan Guarantee 12 May 2022 Ang Boon Tian (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	12 May 2022	Ang Boon Tian (Plaintiff, Respondent): Interim payment order grantedInterim payment order granted against the second defendant, Ms Ng Suzanne, for the sum of $1.6m with interest thereon from 30 September 2021, and costs. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
3	AQU v AQV: Application to Set Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 29 Jan 2015 AQV (Defendant)Won	29 Jan 2015	AQV (Defendant): Award upheldArbitration award in favor of AQV upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai: Arbitration Award Set Aside Due to Arbitrator's Delay 17 Jan 2010 Ting Kang Chung John (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Jan 2010	Ting Kang Chung John (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to extend time to issue arbitration award declined.
5	Anwar Siraj v Ting Kang Chung John: Striking Out Appeal for Untimely Service 08 Dec 2009 Ting Kang Chung John (Respondent, Applicant)Won	08 Dec 2009	Ting Kang Chung John (Respondent, Applicant): Application GrantedApplication to strike out the appeal was granted with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	AM Associates v Laguna National: SOPA Judgment Enforcement & Validity of Payment Claims 22 Nov 2009 AM Associates (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	22 Nov 2009	AM Associates (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff to enforce the adjudication determination. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
7	Anwar Siraj v Ting Kang Chung John: Application to Convert Originating Summons to Writ of Summons Dismissed 26 May 2009 Ting Kang Chung John (Defendant, Respondent)Won	26 May 2009	Ting Kang Chung John (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantCosts of $1,400 awarded to the first defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Anwar Siraj v Ting Kang Chung John: Application to Compel Police Investigation Dismissed 24 Mar 2009 Ting Kang Chung John (Defendant)Won	24 Mar 2009	Ting Kang Chung John (Defendant): Costs AwardedPlaintiffs ordered to pay costs to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai: Injunction for Arbitrator Fees Dispute 09 Nov 2008 Ting Kang Chung John (Plaintiff)Neutral	09 Nov 2008	Ting Kang Chung John (Plaintiff): Injunction maintainedInjunction order to remain in place until the hearing of the Originating Summons. The sum of $250,000 enjoined by the injunction order was paid into court. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai: Extension of Time for Appeal Legal Issue 04 Jun 2008 Ting Kang Chung John (Plaintiff)Lost	04 Jun 2008	Ting Kang Chung John (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPrayer (i) of Summons 855/08 dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai Building Construction: Application for Extension of Time to Issue Arbitral Award 28 Apr 2008 Ting Kang Chung John (Plaintiff)Neutral	28 Apr 2008	Ting Kang Chung John (Plaintiff): Action not dismissedThe court declined to strike out the plaintiff's action.
12	Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai: Discovery, Interlocutory Applications & Hampering Adjudication 09 Apr 2008 Ting Kang Chung John (Plaintiff)Won	09 Apr 2008	Ting Kang Chung John (Plaintiff): Appeals allowed with costsBoth appeals were dismissed with costs fixed at $1,200 to be paid by the second defendant to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Re Jiangshan Investment Consortium Ltd: Competing Claims for Dividend Payments in Winding Up 04 Jun 2007 Tham Lai Ping Winnie (Respondent)Won	04 Jun 2007	Tham Lai Ping Winnie (Respondent): WonEntitled to payment of the dividend according to the Deed.
14	Tan Chiang v Permasteelisa: Leave to Appeal & Extension of Time for Service 03 Apr 2002 Tan Chiang Brother's Marble (S) Pte Ltd (Applicant, Appellant)Won	03 Apr 2002	Tan Chiang Brother's Marble (S) Pte Ltd (Applicant, Appellant): Application AllowedApplication to review and set aside the ruling made by Rajendran J was allowed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Tan Chiang Brother's Marble v Permasteelisa: Granite Cladding Dispute 29 Nov 2001 Tan Chiang Brother's Marble (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Nov 2001	Tan Chiang Brother's Marble (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partThe plaintiffs are entitled to final judgment in the sum of $5,035.84 and GST on the contract sum of $3.2m, equivalent to $96,000. The plaintiffs are awarded interlocutory judgment for the 33 variation claims admitted by the defendants, which claims shall be assessed by the Registrar with costs of assessment reserved to him. Their claims for variation orders nos. 8, 12 and 14 are dismissed with costs. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.