Anwar Siraj v Ting Kang Chung John: Application to Convert Originating Summons to Writ of Summons Dismissed
In Anwar Siraj and Khoo Cheng Neo Norma v Ting Kang Chung John and Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal by the plaintiffs against the Assistant Registrar's decision to disallow their application to convert Originating Summons OS1231/2008/W into a writ of summons. The plaintiffs sought this conversion to address an alleged fraud and a substantial dispute of facts in their dispute with the second defendant, Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd, regarding the construction of their house, where the first defendant, Ting Kang Chung John, was the arbitrator. Justice Andrew Ang dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal, finding no substantial dispute of facts and ordered costs to be paid to the defendants.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Plaintiffs' appeal dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
The High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' application to convert an originating summons to a writ of summons, finding no substantial dispute of facts.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anwar Siraj | Plaintiff, Appellant | Individual | Appeal dismissed | Lost | |
Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd | Defendant, Respondent | Corporation | Judgment for Defendant | Won | |
Khoo Cheng Neo Norma | Plaintiff, Appellant | Individual | Appeal dismissed | Lost | |
Ting Kang Chung John | Defendant, Respondent | Individual | Judgment for Defendant | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Andrew Ang | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
S Thulasidas | Ling Das & Partners |
Ng Yuen | Malkin & Maxwell LLP |
4. Facts
- Plaintiffs and the Contractor entered into arbitration proceedings.
- John Ting was the arbitrator in the arbitration proceedings.
- Plaintiffs sought to set aside the arbitration award.
- Plaintiffs filed Summons No 4814 of 2008 seeking consolidation and conversion to writ action.
- Plaintiffs alleged fraud and substantial dispute of facts.
- The Court of Appeal ordered consolidation of Originating Summons Nos 1807 of 2006 and 1231 of 2008.
5. Formal Citations
- Anwar Siraj and Another v Ting Kang Chung John and Another, OS 1231/2008, RA 470/2008, [2009] SGHC 129
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Originating summons filed by the plaintiffs. | |
Plaintiffs filed Summons No 4814 of 2008. | |
Hearing for prayers 1 to 4, 6 and 7 set out in Summons No 4814 of 2008. | |
Parties returned, first plaintiff maintained the position that the matter should have been converted into a writ action. | |
Judgment delivered. |
7. Legal Issues
- Conversion of Originating Summons to Writ of Summons
- Outcome: The court dismissed the application to convert the originating summons to a writ of summons.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Substantial dispute of facts
- Allegation of fraud
8. Remedies Sought
- Setting aside of the arbitration award
- Referral of disputes to the courts
- Conversion of originating summons to writ of summons
9. Cause of Actions
- No cause of actions
10. Practice Areas
- Litigation
- Arbitration
11. Industries
- Construction
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anwar Siraj v Ting Kang Chung John | High Court | Yes | [2009] SGHC 71 | Singapore | Cited for the decision on prayer 5 of Summons No 4814 of 2008. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2006 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Originating summons
- Writ of summons
- Arbitration
- Fraud
- Consolidation
- Arbitration award
15.2 Keywords
- Originating Summons
- Writ of Summons
- Arbitration
- Singapore High Court
- Civil Procedure
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Civil Practice | 75 |
Arbitration | 60 |
Breach of Contract | 30 |
Contract Law | 25 |
Commercial Disputes | 20 |
16. Subjects
- Civil Procedure