Writ in rem
Writ in rem is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2015 to 2016.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Writ in rem, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases66.7% of area |
Allen & Gledhill LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Mallal & Namazie100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Legal Solutions LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Haridass Ho & Partners100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Rajah and Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Writ in rem, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Ang Cheng Hock100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Yogarajah Yoga Sharmini100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Poh Ying Ying Joanna0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Yip Li Ming100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Tan Teng Muan100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Loh Li Qin100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Yap Yin Soon100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Kwek Choon Lin Winston0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Tan Xeauwei100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Lee Eng Beng0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Han Kook Capital v Winplus: Admiralty Jurisdiction, Action in Rem & Striking Out | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 19 Jan 2016 | Originating Summons No 21 of 2015 and Civil Appeals Nos 58, 59, 60 and 62 of 2015 dismissed. |
2 | Bunge SA v Indian Bank: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Undertaking | High Court | 29 Dec 2015 | Singapore proceedings stayed in favour of India as the more appropriate forum. |
3 | Equatorial Marine v. Bunga Melati 5: Agency, Bunker Supply, & Shipowner Liability | High Court | 21 Jul 2015 | Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. |