Prosecution’s duty to assist the court in respect of sentencing
Prosecution’s duty to assist the court in respect of sentencing is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 4 cases from 2010 to 2015.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Prosecution’s duty to assist the court in respect of sentencing, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Attorney-General’s Chambers33.33% success rate | 3 cases75.0% of area |
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Gloria James-Civetta & Co0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Ong Ying Ping Esq0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Prosecution100.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Thangavelu LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Prosecution’s duty to assist the court in respect of sentencing, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Gordon Oh0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Hon Yi0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Ng Yiwen100.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Chan Tai-Hui Jason0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Nicholas Lai Yi Shin0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Mark Tay100.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Thangavelu0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
April Phang Suet Fern0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Chua Ying-Hong100.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Foo Cheow Ming0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 4 most recent judgments out of 4 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Lim Bee Ngan Karen v PP: Parity Principle & Sentencing for Betting Act Offences | High Court | 15 Jul 2015 | Appeal allowed in part. The imprisonment terms for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges were replaced with an imprisonment term of four months for each of these three Proceeded Charges. The imprisonment terms for the Third Proceeded Charge and the Fifth Proceeded Charge are to run consecutively, making a total imprisonment term of eight months for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges. The fines imposed by the Sentencing Judge for all five Proceeded Charges as well as the default imprisonment terms in respect of those fines were upheld. |
2 | Public Prosecutor v Sollihin bin Anhar: Revocation of Bail and Standard of Proof | Court of Appeal | 29 Mar 2015 | Matter remitted to the State Courts for reconsideration of the prosecution’s application for revocation of bail. |
3 | Sivakumar v PP: Sexual Assault, Impersonation, and Consent | Court of Appeal | 12 Mar 2014 | Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against acquittal allowed. |
4 | Public Prosecutor v Shamsul bin Sa’at: Aggravated Rape, Sexual Assault, and Housebreaking | High Court | 29 Apr 2010 | Accused sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 25 years and 24 strokes of the cane. |