Prosecution’s duty to assist the court in respect of sentencing

Prosecution’s duty to assist the court in respect of sentencing is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 4 cases from 2010 to 2015.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Prosecution’s duty to assist the court in respect of sentencing, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Attorney-General’s Chambers33.33% success rate3 cases75.0% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Gloria James-Civetta & Co0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Ong Ying Ping Esq0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Prosecution100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Thangavelu LLC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Prosecution’s duty to assist the court in respect of sentencing, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Gordon Oh0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Hon Yi0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Ng Yiwen100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Chan Tai-Hui Jason0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Nicholas Lai Yi Shin0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Mark Tay100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Thangavelu0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
April Phang Suet Fern0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Chua Ying-Hong100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Foo Cheow Ming0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 4 most recent judgments out of 4 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Lim Bee Ngan Karen v PP: Parity Principle & Sentencing for Betting Act OffencesHigh Court15 Jul 2015
Appeal allowed in part. The imprisonment terms for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges were replaced with an imprisonment term of four months for each of these three Proceeded Charges. The imprisonment terms for the Third Proceeded Charge and the Fifth Proceeded Charge are to run consecutively, making a total imprisonment term of eight months for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges. The fines imposed by the Sentencing Judge for all five Proceeded Charges as well as the default imprisonment terms in respect of those fines were upheld.
2Public Prosecutor v Sollihin bin Anhar: Revocation of Bail and Standard of ProofCourt of Appeal29 Mar 2015
Matter remitted to the State Courts for reconsideration of the prosecution’s application for revocation of bail.
3Sivakumar v PP: Sexual Assault, Impersonation, and ConsentCourt of Appeal12 Mar 2014
Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against acquittal allowed.
4Public Prosecutor v Shamsul bin Sa’at: Aggravated Rape, Sexual Assault, and HousebreakingHigh Court29 Apr 2010
Accused sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 25 years and 24 strokes of the cane.