Parol Evidence Rule

Parol Evidence Rule is a primary practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 7 cases from 2005 to 2023.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Parol Evidence Rule, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Fernandez LLC0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Shook Lin & Bok LLP100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Drew & Napier LLC100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Wong & Leow LLC0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Covenant Chambers LLC0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Ascendant Legal LLC100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Kelvin Chia Partnership0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Prestige Legal LLP100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Godwin Campos LLC0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Parol Evidence Rule, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Mohamed Arshad Bin Mohamed Tahir0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Lee Ee Yang0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Wong En Hui Charis0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Chew Kei-Jin100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Joseph Tay Weiwen100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Tan Wei Sze100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Tan Kah Wai100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Celeste Ang0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Patrick Fernandez0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 7 most recent judgments out of 7 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Tan Tien Sek v Tan Tien Sai: Oral Contract & Parol Evidence Rule DisputeGeneral Division of the High Court30 Mar 2023
Claim Dismissed
2Kelington Engineering v Gan Cheng Chuan: Parol Evidence Rule & Liquidated DamagesGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore25 Apr 2022
All of Kelington's claims against Mr. Gan are dismissed, save for the consent judgment for RM24,000 which has already been satisfied by Mr. Gan.
3Marken Limited (Singapore Branch) v Scott Ohanesian: Breach of Contract of Service & Termination Without NoticeHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore19 Oct 2017
Claim dismissed in its entirety.
4Ling Yew Kong v Teo Vin Li Richard: Enforceability of Settlement Agreement & Illegality DefenseHigh Court08 Jan 2014
Appeal Allowed
5Sitt Tatt Bhd v Goh Tai Hock: Breach of Trust and Contract Dispute over Oil & Gas Project FundingHigh Court25 Nov 2008
Judgment for Plaintiff
6-26 Jun 2008
Unknown
7China Insurance v Liberty Insurance: Double Insurance & Contribution ClaimsHigh Court27 Feb 2005
Plaintiff's application dismissed.