Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice

Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 32 cases from 2000 to 2021.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Attorney-General’s Chambers61.90% success rate21 cases65.6% of area
Deputy Public Prosecutor60.00% success rate5 cases15.6% of area
Harry Elias Partnership66.67% success rate3 cases9.4% of area
WongPartnership LLP66.67% success rate3 cases9.4% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP33.33% success rate3 cases9.4% of area
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate2 cases6.3% of area
Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate2 cases6.3% of area
Dew Chambers0.00% success rate1 cases3.1% of area
Independent Practitioner0.00% success rate1 cases3.1% of area
Providence Law Asia LLC0.00% success rate1 cases3.1% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Sharmila Sripathy-Shanaz33.33% success rate3 cases9.4% of area
Sunil Sudheesan33.33% success rate3 cases9.4% of area
Subhas Anandan50.00% success rate2 cases6.3% of area
Charlene Tay Chia0.00% success rate2 cases6.3% of area
Michael Quilindo0.00% success rate2 cases6.3% of area
Leong Wing Tuck100.00% success rate2 cases6.3% of area
April Phang Suet Fern50.00% success rate2 cases6.3% of area
Thangavelu0.00% success rate2 cases6.3% of area
Tan Soo Tet50.00% success rate2 cases6.3% of area
Bala Reddy100.00% success rate2 cases6.3% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 32 most recent judgments out of 32 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Rajendran v Public Prosecutor: Women's Charter, PHTA & Penal Code OffencesGeneral Division of the High Court24 Aug 2021
Appeal Allowed in Part
2VKC v VJZ: Anti-Suit Injunction & Exclusive Jurisdiction in Estate DisputeCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore28 Jul 2021
Appeal Dismissed
3Mohammad Yusof bin Jantan v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review ApplicationGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore21 Jun 2021
Application dismissed summarily.
4Tan Kok Meng v Public Prosecutor: Unsoundness of Mind and Causation in MurderCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore17 May 2021
Appeal Dismissed
5Pang Ah San v Singapore Medical Council: Doctor's Disciplinary Appeal for Improper Conduct DismissedGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore11 May 2021
Appeal Dismissed
6Tang Keng Lai v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference, Abuse of Process, and Costs ImplicationsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore10 May 2021
Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay costs to the Prosecution.
7-29 Jun 2020
Unknown
8Public Prosecutor v Wee Teong Boo: Rape, Sexual Assault, Outrage of ModestyHigh Court29 Aug 2019
Accused acquitted on rape charge, convicted of sexual assault by penetration and outrage of modesty.
9Public Prosecutor v Ridhaudin Ridhwan: Rape, Attempted Rape, Sexual Penetration, Outrage of Modesty, Consent, Mistake of FactHigh Court22 Apr 2019
Accused 1 convicted on all charges; Accused 2 convicted on one charge and acquitted on another; Accused 3 convicted on all charges.
10BLV v Public Prosecutor: Adducing Fresh Evidence, Abuse of Process, False EvidenceHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore20 Jan 2019
Original verdict upheld; new evidence rejected; finding of abuse of process.
11PP v Mohd Ariffan: Adducing Fresh Evidence on Appeal in Sexual Offence CaseCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore13 Feb 2018
The Prosecution's application to admit the affidavits of Matin, Superintendent Chua, and Assistant Superintendent Jaga was dismissed. The application to admit the evidence of Ms. Ng was allowed in part. Ms. Ng's affidavit, section 7, and paragraphs 5.3.4 and 5.5 of the expert report are admitted as further evidence in this appeal.
12Public Prosecutor v BPK: Attempted Murder & ProvocationHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore13 Feb 2018
Accused convicted on the charge of attempted murder.
13Pram Nair v Public Prosecutor: Rape, Intoxication, and ConsentCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore24 Sep 2017
Appeal dismissed in part. Conviction affirmed. Sentence for rape affirmed; sentence for digital penetration reduced.
14Rajendar Prasad Rai v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Orders Pending Restraint Order Application Under CDSAHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore30 Jul 2017
Prosecution's application dismissed.
15PP v Muhammad Firman: Rape, Sexual Assault, Impersonating Public ServantHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore27 Oct 2016
Guilty verdict and sentence imposed on all three charges.
16Lim Bee Ngan Karen v PP: Parity Principle & Sentencing for Betting Act OffencesHigh Court15 Jul 2015
Appeal allowed in part. The imprisonment terms for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges were replaced with an imprisonment term of four months for each of these three Proceeded Charges. The imprisonment terms for the Third Proceeded Charge and the Fifth Proceeded Charge are to run consecutively, making a total imprisonment term of eight months for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges. The fines imposed by the Sentencing Judge for all five Proceeded Charges as well as the default imprisonment terms in respect of those fines were upheld.
17Re Beloff Michael Jacob QC: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, Schemes of ArrangementCourt of Appeal15 May 2014
Appeals allowed and the Judge’s decision to admit Mr Beloff on an ad hoc basis to represent nTan in the Setting-Aside Summonses was set aside.
18Sivakumar v PP: Sexual Assault, Impersonation, and ConsentCourt of Appeal12 Mar 2014
Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against acquittal allowed.
19PP v Lim Ghim Peow: Culpable Homicide, Major Depressive Disorder & Sentencing PrinciplesHigh Court26 Jan 2014
The accused was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment.
20Seah Hock Thiam v Public Prosecutor: Abetting Perversion of Justice for Parking OffencesHigh Court18 Jul 2013
Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part.
21Wang Wenfeng v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Appeal for Taxi Driver's DeathCourt of Appeal22 Aug 2012
Appeal Dismissed
22Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Shahdadpuri: MTIC Fraud & Revenue LawHigh Court24 Jan 2011
Claim struck out; Mareva Injunction discharged.
23Public Prosecutor v Shamsul bin Sa’at: Aggravated Rape, Sexual Assault, and HousebreakingHigh Court29 Apr 2010
Accused sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 25 years and 24 strokes of the cane.
24PP v Sarle Steepan: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Infant DeathHigh Court14 Sep 2009
Accused sentenced to 18 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane.
25Public Prosecutor v Gansean: Rape Conviction Upheld on AppealCourt of Appeal07 Jul 2009
Prosecution's appeal allowed; Respondent's appeal dismissed; Respondent convicted of rape.
26Tan Kay Beng v PP: Theft & Criminal Intimidation Sentencing AppealHigh Court06 Jul 2006
Appeal Allowed
27Sarjit Singh Rapati v PP: Extortion, Wrongful Confinement & False Impersonation AppealHigh Court01 Feb 2005
Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part.
28Md Anverdeen Basheer Ahmed v PP: Rioting with Deadly Weapons & Criminal IntimidationHigh Court17 Oct 2004
Appeals dismissed.
29Public Prosecutor v Akbar Late Md Hossain Howlader: Rape under Penal Code s 376(1)High Court14 Jun 2004
Accused convicted on first charge of rape and acquitted on second charge of rape.
30Louis Pius Gilbert v PP: Grievous Hurt, Provocation, & Sentence EnhancementHigh Court12 Dec 2002
Appeal against conviction dismissed; sentence enhanced to ten years' imprisonment.
31Public Prosecutor v Anthony Ler & Z: Abetment to Murder & Murder under Penal CodeHigh Court04 Dec 2001
Anthony Ler was found guilty of abetment to murder and sentenced to death. Z was found guilty of murder and sentenced to be detained during the President's pleasure.
32Public Prosecutor v Ng Ai Tiong: Abetment by Instigation to Give False Evidence in Civil SuitHigh Court02 Jan 2000
Appeal allowed.