Negligent misrepresentation
Negligent misrepresentation is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 13 cases from 2000 to 2024.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Negligent misrepresentation, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Attorney-General’s Chambers33.33% success rate | 3 cases23.1% of area |
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP33.33% success rate | 3 cases23.1% of area |
Union Law LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Straits Law Practice LLC50.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP100.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
UniLegal LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Adelphi Law Chambers LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Law Society’s Criminal Legal Aid Scheme0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
I.R.B. Law0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Negligent misrepresentation, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
N Sreenivasan33.33% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Loh Jen Wei100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Quah Chun En Joel0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Lum Rui Loong Manfred50.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Nair Suresh Sukumaran0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Nandwani Manoj Prakash0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim50.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Sameer bin Amir Melber0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Sim Jek Sok Disa100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Muhammad Imran Bin Abdul Rahim100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 13 most recent judgments out of 13 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Budhrani v INTL FCStone: Margin Trading, Broker-Dealer Agreements & Investor Claims | Appellate Division of the High Court | 23 Sep 2024 | Appeal Dismissed |
2 | Wong Ben v The WatchFund Ltd: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in Luxury Watch Investment Scheme | General Division of the High Court | 29 Apr 2024 | Judgment for Plaintiffs in part; claims for misrepresentation dismissed; specific performance ordered for breach of contract. |
3 | Low Sing Khiang v LogicMills: Misrepresentation & Contract Rescission | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 04 May 2023 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
4 | Bay Lim Piang v Lye Cher Kang: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Loan Recission | General Division of the High Court | 18 Jan 2023 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
5 | Yong Khong Yoong v Ting Choon Meng: Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Conspiracy in Healthstats Investment | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 28 Oct 2021 | Plaintiffs' claims dismissed. |
6 | Haw Wan Sin v Sim Tee Meng: Negligent Misrepresentation & Agent Liability | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 16 Dec 2018 | Appeal Allowed in Part |
7 | IM Skaugen v MAN Diesel: Misrepresentation, Assignment, and Forum in Marine Engine Fuel Consumption Dispute | High Court | 24 May 2018 | Appeal Allowed |
8 | PP v Mohd Ariffan: Adducing Fresh Evidence on Appeal in Sexual Offence Case | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 13 Feb 2018 | The Prosecution's application to admit the affidavits of Matin, Superintendent Chua, and Assistant Superintendent Jaga was dismissed. The application to admit the evidence of Ms. Ng was allowed in part. Ms. Ng's affidavit, section 7, and paragraphs 5.3.4 and 5.5 of the expert report are admitted as further evidence in this appeal. |
9 | Mathew Koottappillil Mathew v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Corruption Sentence | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 23 Feb 2017 | Appeal allowed in part. |
10 | Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non Conveniens | High Court | 07 Feb 2003 | Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed. |
11 | Wan Kim Hock v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust Appeal | High Court | 09 Dec 2002 | Appeal dismissed |
12 | Rapiscan Asia v Global Container: Bill of Lading, Contract Terms & Negligence in Shipping | High Court | 15 Apr 2002 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
13 | Public Prosecutor v Teo Cheng Kiat: Criminal Breach of Trust by SIA Employee | High Court | 05 Jul 2000 | Accused sentenced to 24 years in prison. |