Involuntary Bailment

Involuntary Bailment is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2003 to 2024.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Involuntary Bailment, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Nine Yards Chambers LLC0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Ignatius J & Associates100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
David Nayar and Associates100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Harry Elias Partnership100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Deputy Public Prosecutor0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Rodyk & Davidson100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Lim & Lim100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Involuntary Bailment, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Sunil Sudheesan100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Yeo Lai Hock Nichol0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Qua Bi Qi0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Leong Wen Jia Nicholas0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Joseph Ignatius100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Suja Susan Thomas d/o B Thomas100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
David Nayar100.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Lee Lit Cheng0.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area
Philip Jeyaretnam50.00% success rate1 cases33.3% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Tan Cheng Cheng v Shamlal: Conversion & Estate Admin of Richard Mille WatchGeneral Division of the High Court11 Jul 2024
Appeal Dismissed
2Tan Kay Beng v PP: Theft & Criminal Intimidation Sentencing AppealHigh Court06 Jul 2006
Appeal Allowed
3Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non ConveniensHigh Court07 Feb 2003
Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed.