Foreign Manpower Act
Foreign Manpower Act is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 2 cases from 2003 to 2024.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Foreign Manpower Act, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Sanders Law LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Ministry of Manpower Legal Services Division0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Rodyk & Davidson100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Lim & Lim100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Foreign Manpower Act, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Sarbrinder Singh s/o Naranjan Singh100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Nicholas Say Gui Xi100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Samuel Chua Hwa Kuan0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Nee Yingxin0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Brian Tang Wai Lreng0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Philip Jeyaretnam50.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Goh Peng Fong50.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Bal Ratanesh Kaur0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Anil M Changaroth50.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 2 most recent judgments out of 2 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Alka v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Employment of Foreign Manpower Act Charge | General Division of the High Court | 24 Jul 2024 | Appeal against conviction is allowed and the appellant acquitted of the charge against her. The appeal against sentence accordingly falls away. |
2 | Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non Conveniens | High Court | 07 Feb 2003 | Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed. |