Early Dismissal
Early Dismissal is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2005 to 2023.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Early Dismissal, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases66.7% of area |
Drew & Napier LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Providence Law Asia LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Setia Law LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Wong Partnership0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Wong Thomas and Leong0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Early Dismissal, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Zhulkarnain Abdul Rahim0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Low Chai Chong0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Zhuo Jiaxiang0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Ong Tun Wei Danny100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Gregory Vijayendran0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Wendell Wong100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Reuben Gavin Peter0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Hannah Chua0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Bethel Chan Ruiyi100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Prakash Pillai0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DBO v DBP: Application to Set Aside Partial Arbitration Award - Frustration Doctrine & COVID-19 Impact | Singapore International Commercial Court | 19 Nov 2023 | Application dismissed |
2 | HRA Corp (SG) Pte Ltd v Cheng Mun Yip Marcus: Interim Payment Application | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 16 May 2018 | Application dismissed. |
3 | Tan Yeow Hiang Kenneth v Tan Chor Chuan: Review of Costs in Defamation Action | High Court | 09 Nov 2005 | The court decided that it did not have the power to allow a further reduction on account of the failed defenses. The court also decided that, even if it were open to it to grant a reduction, no reduction ought to be allowed. |