Double Separability
Double Separability is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 6 cases from 2015 to 2021.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Double Separability, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
WongPartnership LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases33.3% of area |
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Shook Lin & Bok LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Mallal & Namazie100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Legal Clinic LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
CLASIS LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
AsiaLegal LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Rajah & Tann LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Premier Law LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Essex Court Chambers Duxton (Singapore Practice Group)100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Double Separability, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Colin Liew100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Lin Weiqi Wendy0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Tan Ruo Yu0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Nakul Dewan0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Disa Sim100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Jonathan Lim Shi Cao0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Goh Wei Wei0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
David Isidore Tan Huang Loong100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Chan Ming Onn David100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Dhillon Dinesh Singh0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 6 most recent judgments out of 6 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CJD v CJE and CJF: Dispute over Joinder of Third Parties in Arbitration under LCIA Rules | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 18 Mar 2021 | Originating Summons dismissed |
2 | Tamar Perry v Bonnet Esculier: Interpleader, Striking Out, Pleadings Amendment in Offshore Case | Singapore International Commercial Court | 29 Oct 2020 | Application to strike out the unjust enrichment claim succeeded. Leave to amend the Writ and Statement of Claim was not granted in certain respects. The case was designated as an Offshore case. |
3 | CBX v CBZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards for Exceeding Jurisdiction and Public Policy | Singapore International Commercial Court | 15 Jul 2020 | Plaintiffs' setting aside applications are dismissed. |
4 | BRQ v BRS: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Cost Overrun & BPTA Charges | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 17 Nov 2019 | Both applications dismissed, thereby leaving the award intact. |
5 | Bunge SA v Indian Bank: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Undertaking | High Court | 29 Dec 2015 | Singapore proceedings stayed in favour of India as the more appropriate forum. |
6 | William Jacks v Nelson Honey: Long-Arm Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens | High Court | 15 Sep 2015 | Summons dismissed on the condition that William Jacks abandons proceedings in New Zealand if it fails to dismiss or stay proceedings there. |