Double Separability

Double Separability is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 6 cases from 2015 to 2021.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Double Separability, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
WongPartnership LLP0.00% success rate2 cases33.3% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Shook Lin & Bok LLP100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Mallal & Namazie100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Legal Clinic LLC100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
CLASIS LLC0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
AsiaLegal LLC0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Rajah & Tann LLP100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Premier Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Essex Court Chambers Duxton (Singapore Practice Group)100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Double Separability, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Colin Liew100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Lin Weiqi Wendy0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Tan Ruo Yu0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Nakul Dewan0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Disa Sim100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Jonathan Lim Shi Cao0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Goh Wei Wei0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
David Isidore Tan Huang Loong100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Chan Ming Onn David100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Dhillon Dinesh Singh0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 6 most recent judgments out of 6 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1CJD v CJE and CJF: Dispute over Joinder of Third Parties in Arbitration under LCIA RulesGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore18 Mar 2021
Originating Summons dismissed
2Tamar Perry v Bonnet Esculier: Interpleader, Striking Out, Pleadings Amendment in Offshore CaseSingapore International Commercial Court29 Oct 2020
Application to strike out the unjust enrichment claim succeeded. Leave to amend the Writ and Statement of Claim was not granted in certain respects. The case was designated as an Offshore case.
3CBX v CBZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards for Exceeding Jurisdiction and Public PolicySingapore International Commercial Court15 Jul 2020
Plaintiffs' setting aside applications are dismissed.
4BRQ v BRS: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Cost Overrun & BPTA ChargesHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore17 Nov 2019
Both applications dismissed, thereby leaving the award intact.
5Bunge SA v Indian Bank: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of UndertakingHigh Court29 Dec 2015
Singapore proceedings stayed in favour of India as the more appropriate forum.
6William Jacks v Nelson Honey: Long-Arm Jurisdiction & Forum Non ConveniensHigh Court15 Sep 2015
Summons dismissed on the condition that William Jacks abandons proceedings in New Zealand if it fails to dismiss or stay proceedings there.