Construction Defects
Construction Defects is a primary practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 12 cases from 2001 to 2020.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Construction Defects, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Allen & Gledhill50.00% success rate | 2 cases16.7% of area |
Winston Quek & Company0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Kelvin Chia Partnership0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Joyce A. Tan & Partners LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Central Chambers Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Tan Rajah & Cheah0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Lee & Lee0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Chia Wong Chambers LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Just Law LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Construction Defects, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Wong Siew Hong66.67% success rate | 2 cases16.7% of area |
Tan Tee Jim50.00% success rate | 2 cases16.7% of area |
Quek Seng Soon Winston0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Lim Ying Sin Daniel0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Han Wah Teng0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Moiz Haider Sithawalla0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Lye Hoong Yip Raymond100.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Ho Chien Mien0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Darryl Chew Zijie0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Gan Guo Bin0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 12 most recent judgments out of 12 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ramo Industries v DLE Solutions: Structural Steel Contract Dispute | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 06 Jan 2020 | Judgment for Plaintiff in part; Counterclaim allowed in part. |
2 | PEX International v Lim Seng Chye: Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher & Foreseeability | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 18 Dec 2019 | Both appeals dismissed. The court upheld the High Court's decision that PEX was liable in nuisance and under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher, but clarified the role of foreseeability in these torts. |
3 | Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement & Groundless Threat of Proceedings | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 05 Apr 2018 | Appeal allowed in part. |
4 | Wartsila v Liu: Copyright Infringement & Discovery of Ship Drawings in AutoCAD Format | High Court | 01 Jul 2014 | Order for re-tender of copies of drawings in native format granted; costs of compliance and application awarded to the defendants. |
5 | Moh Seng Cranes v Hup Hin: Crane Damage Due to Worksite Negligence | High Court | 10 Dec 2012 | Judgment for Plaintiff against the second defendant, Jurong Prime Wide Pte Ltd. |
6 | PH Hydraulics v Intrepid Offshore: Copyright Infringement, Breach of Confidence, and Non-Competition Clause Dispute | High Court | 26 Jun 2012 | Judgment for Plaintiff in part. |
7 | Sato Kogyo v Socomec: Negligence Claim for Fire Damage Due to Defective UPS System | High Court | 10 Apr 2012 | Plaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs. |
8 | King Lung Trading v Tiong Seng Contractors: Tile Defect Dispute in Construction Project | High Court | 23 Nov 2008 | Judgment for Plaintiff; Defendant's Counterclaim Dismissed |
9 | Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Assessment of Damages for Misrepresentation in Façade Work Contract | High Court | 13 Aug 2007 | Judgment for the defendant, with partial claims allowed. |
10 | Hong Cheng v Wee Siong: Contract Variation & Interpretation Dispute | High Court | 06 Mar 2003 | Judgment for Plaintiff in part; Defendant's counterclaim dismissed. |
11 | Fragrance Foodstuff v Bee Cheng Hiang: Copyright & Trademark Infringement Dispute | High Court | 08 Jul 2002 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
12 | Shia Kian Eng v Nakano Singapore: Construction Dispute over Plastering Works and Wrongful Termination | High Court | 02 Apr 2001 | Judgment for Plaintiff |