W Y Steel Construction Pte Ltd

W Y Steel Construction Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 10 counsels. Through 3 law firms.

Legal Representation

W Y Steel Construction Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 10 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Lee Eng Beng Kelvin Poon
Legal Solutions LLC	1 case	Gina Tan Henry Heng Corinne Taylor Corinne Taylor Lai Sze Huei Henry Heng Gwee Nam Gina Tan Yiting
WongPartnership LLP	1 case	Jasmine Low Ng Pei Yin

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of W Y Steel Construction Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of W Y Steel Construction Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	4,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2016-sghc-80 21 Apr 2016	21 Apr 2016	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's application for leave to proceed with Suit 112 was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendant's costs of the application fixed at $8,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2013-sgca-32 29 Apr 2013	29 Apr 2013	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed; required to pay the adjudicated sum to Osko Pte Ltd. Stay application also dismissed.
3	2012-sghc-194 26 Sep 2012	26 Sep 2012	Plaintiff, Appellant	LostThe plaintiff's application to set aside the Adjudication Determination was dismissed.