VJP

VJP is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

VJP has been represented by 1 law firm and 3 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of VJP's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.0
Complex Cases
0 (0.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Partial12.0 parties avg
Won12.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
202112.0 parties avg
202012.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of VJP's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Partial1(50.0%)
Won1(50.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD52,665.731 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20211
1
20201
1

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
11 Aug 2021
AppellantWonWife is entitled to 44.8% of the reduced matrimonial pool, resulting in an additional $52,665.73.
28 Sep 2020
Respondent, AppellantPartialThe sum of $140,000 being the purchase price of the Primefield shares was excluded from the matrimonial assets. The sum of $176,250 being the sum of the undisbursed housing loan for the Botanique apartment was excluded from the matrimonial assets, with liberty to apply in the event that the loan is not disbursed. The children’s monthly maintenance is payable on the 3rd instead of the 23rd of each month.