VJP
VJP is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
VJP has been represented by 1 law firm and 3 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Silvester Legal LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of VJP's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Partial | 12.0 parties avg |
Won | 12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 12.0 parties avg |
2020 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of VJP's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Partial | 1(50.0%) |
Won | 1(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 52,665.731 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 1 1 |
2020 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 2 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
11 Aug 2021 | Appellant | WonWife is entitled to 44.8% of the reduced matrimonial pool, resulting in an additional $52,665.73. |
28 Sep 2020 | Respondent, Appellant | PartialThe sum of $140,000 being the purchase price of the Primefield shares was excluded from the matrimonial assets. The sum of $176,250 being the sum of the undisbursed housing loan for the Botanique apartment was excluded from the matrimonial assets, with liberty to apply in the event that the loan is not disbursed. The children’s monthly maintenance is payable on the 3rd instead of the 23rd of each month. |