Supreme Star Investments Ltd

Supreme Star Investments Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 1 law firm. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Supreme Star Investments Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	1 case	Narayanan Sreenivasan SC Muralli Rajaram Kyle Gabriel Peters

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Supreme Star Investments Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33.3%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33.3%
Struck Out	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Supreme Star Investments Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Neutral	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Struck Out	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Struck Out: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sghca-6 02 Feb 2023	02 Feb 2023	Plaintiff	Struck OutSSI's claim was struck out in April 2020 following its failure to comply with an unless order for specific discovery.
2	2022-sghc-41 24 Feb 2022	24 Feb 2022	Plaintiff	NeutralSSI was joined as a co-plaintiff but did not seek any relief under the Statement of Claim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2020-sghc-125 17 Jun 2020	17 Jun 2020	Plaintiff	LostThe second plaintiff did not file any appeal of its own. Since the Unless Order was not complied with by the stipulated deadline, the plaintiffs’ claim was struck off accordingly.