Shafeeg bin Salim Talib

Shafeeg bin Salim Talib is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 3 law firms. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 66.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Shafeeg bin Salim Talib has been represented by 3 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	Kelvin Poon Andre Yeap Farrah Salam
AbrahamLow LLC	1 case	Kelvin Poon Andre Yeap Aloysius Leng
Abraham Low LLC	1 case	Aloysius Leng

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shafeeg bin Salim Talib's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 2 (66.7%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.7 parties avg	3.7	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shafeeg bin Salim Talib's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2011-sghc-165 06 Jul 2011	06 Jul 2011	Plaintiff, Appellant	LostThe appeal against the decision of the Assistant Registrar was dismissed.
2	2010-sgca-11 17 Mar 2010	17 Mar 2010	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed with costs to be paid from their own funds and not out of the Estate. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2009-sghc-100 23 Apr 2009	23 Apr 2009	Plaintiff	LostThe originating summons was dismissed, and the plaintiffs were ordered to pay costs to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.