Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd

Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 14 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 28.6% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 14 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Colin Liew Chia Voon Jiet Cavinder Bull SC Tan Kon Yeng Eugene Eugene Tan Rajaram Vikram Raja Tan Liam Beng Soh Chun York
Eldan Law LLP	1 case	Amanda Koh Jia Yi Linus Lin Zhiyi Yong Boon On
Leong Partnership	2 cases	Tan Yew Cheng
Gurbani & Co.	1 case	Prem Kumar Gurbani Adrian Aw Hon Wei

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	28.6%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	42.9%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	28.6%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(28.6%)	28.6%
Partial	3(42.9%)	42.9%
Won	2(28.6%)	28.6%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	16,000.00	2,666.676 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2017-sghc-103 16 May 2017	16 May 2017	Respondent	WonApplication to set aside the Injunction granted; costs of $15,000 (all-in) to be paid by Tactic to Sato Kogyo. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2014-sgca-35 29 May 2014	29 May 2014	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed with costs. SK is to make payment to ACS for all the RMC supplied by ACS, but the cost of SK procuring sand for ACS to produce RMC should be deducted from any such sums which SK owes ACS. Any RMC supplied by ACS to SK prior to 6 February 2007 will be assessed at the rates stipulated in the Contracts. With respect to the RMC supplied by ACS after the Sand Ban and from 6 February 2007 onwards, we grant ACS’s prayer for payment from SK of a reasonable sum, to be assessed on a restitutionary quantum meruit and/or valebat basis. All the aforementioned sums should be assessed by the Registrar. Interest on the assessed sums is awarded at the rate of 3% per annum from the date of filing of the writ to the date of assessment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2013-sghc-127 04 Jul 2013	04 Jul 2013	Defendant	PartialThe defendant's counterclaim for losses due to the plaintiff's breach of contract was allowed; damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2012-sghc-76 10 Apr 2012	10 Apr 2012	Plaintiff	LostClaim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2010-sghc-338 14 Nov 2010	14 Nov 2010	Defendant, Respondent	WonDefendant's application for discovery of documents was granted; costs of $1,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2007-sgca-39 28 Aug 2007	28 Aug 2007	Respondent, Plaintiff	PartialAppeal allowed in part. The exact quantum of damages to be awarded to the Plaintiff is to be assessed by the Registrar if the parties are unable to agree thereon. The Plaintiff is also entitled to interest on this sum at 3% per annum with effect from 22 July 2005, which is the date the writ was filed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	2006-sghc-213 23 Nov 2006	23 Nov 2006	Plaintiff	PartialInterlocutory judgment for the plaintiff with costs on its claim. The plaintiff's claim of $1,685,395.66 by way of damages (reduced to $465,648.88 in Yew’s supplemental affidavit in chief) must go for assessment with the costs of assessment to be reserved to the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.