Salim Anthony
Salim Anthony is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Salim Anthony has been represented by 1 law firm and 4 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Drew and Napier LLC | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Salim Anthony's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 9.5
- Complex Cases
- 2 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Neutral | 18.0 parties avg |
| Won | 111.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 29.5 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Salim Anthony's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Neutral | 1(50.0%) |
| Won | 1(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 2 11 |
Case History
Displaying all 2 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
02 Sep 2004 | Respondent, Defendant | NeutralThe court ruled that it had no jurisdiction to hear the applications for the adduction of fresh evidence and directed that they be adjourned to be heard before the full Court of Appeal. |
03 Jun 2004 | Plaintiff | WonJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court declared the assignment invalid and affirmed the plaintiff's discharge of obligations under the guarantee, entitling him to subrogation rights. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |