Ramalingam Ravinthran
Ramalingam Ravinthran is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 4 law firms.
Legal Representation
Ramalingam Ravinthran has been represented by 4 law firms and 5 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Damodara, Hazra, K Sureshan LLP | 2 cases |
| L F Violet Netto | 2 cases |
| Jeya & Associates | 1 case |
| Gomez & Vasu | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Ramalingam Ravinthran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 42.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2012 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2011 | 22.0 parties avg |
| 2009 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Ramalingam Ravinthran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 4(100.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2012 | 1 1 |
| 2011 | 1 2 |
| 2009 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
09 Jan 2012 | Applicant | LostThe applicant's motion to re-open the judgment was dismissed. |
30 May 2011 | Plaintiff | LostPlaintiff's application for a prohibition order against the Director of Prisons and a mandatory order against the Attorney-General was dismissed. No order was made with respect to costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
10 Apr 2011 | Appellant | LostThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed. |
24 Nov 2009 | Defendant | LostAccused found guilty and convicted on two charges; death sentence imposed for each charge. |