Newcon Builders Pte Ltd

Newcon Builders Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Newcon Builders Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 case	Tang Jin Sheng Joseph Lee
LVM Law Chambers LLC	1 case	Tang Jin Sheng Lok Vi Ming Joseph Lee Sien Liang
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	4 cases	Tang Jin Sheng Lok Vi Ming Joseph Lee Lee Sien Liang Joseph

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Newcon Builders Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	16.7%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Newcon Builders Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50.0%)	50.0%
Partial	1(16.7%)	16.7%
Won	2(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,002,889.21	167,148.206 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2017-sgca-53 17 Sep 2017	17 Sep 2017	Respondent	PartialThe court upheld the decision that Newcon was entitled to terminate the Sub-Contract as CAA’s breaches of clause 2 of the Letter of Intent had substantially deprived Newcon of the whole benefit of the Sub-Contract. However, the order for CAA to pay $407,000 to Newcon for liquidated damages paid to JTC was set aside.
2	2016-sghc-246 28 Nov 2016	28 Nov 2016	Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim	WonDefendant's counterclaim is largely allowed.
3	2015-sghc-226 20 Sep 2015	20 Sep 2015	Plaintiff, Respondent	WonAppeal allowed; the Adjudication Determination was set aside. Orders made below, including the order for costs, were also set aside, with the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2015-sghcr-13 10 Jun 2015	10 Jun 2015	Plaintiff	LostApplication to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $7,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	2014-sghc-254 27 Nov 2014	27 Nov 2014	Defendant, Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed against the Defendant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2014-sghcr-10 27 May 2014	27 May 2014	Defendant	LostThe defendant's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed, and the defendant was ordered to pay costs of $6,000 plus reasonable disbursements to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.