National Oilwell Varco Norway AS (formerly known as Hydralift AS)

National Oilwell Varco Norway AS (formerly known as Hydralift AS) is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

National Oilwell Varco Norway AS (formerly known as Hydralift AS) has been represented by 1 law firm and 9 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 case	Kelvin Poon Seow Hwang Seng John Poon Kin Mun Kelvin Kristin Ng Wei Ting John Seow Aleksandar Anatoliev Georgiev Lee Eng Beng SC Aleksandar Georgiev Kristin Ng

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of National Oilwell Varco Norway AS (formerly known as Hydralift AS)'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of National Oilwell Varco Norway AS (formerly known as Hydralift AS)'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	20,000.00	10,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sgca-24 15 Mar 2022	15 Mar 2022	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; no order as to costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2021-sghc-124 10 Jun 2021	10 Jun 2021	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's application to enforce the arbitration award was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendant's costs fixed at $20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).