Nanyang Law LLC

Nanyang Law LLC is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 2 law firms. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Nanyang Law LLC has been represented by 2 law firms and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 case	Ng Hui Min Philip Jeyaretnam
PK Wong & Associates LLC	1 case	Andrew Ang

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nanyang Law LLC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.3 parties avg	3.3	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nanyang Law LLC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2012-sghc-184 09 Sep 2012	09 Sep 2012	Defendant	LostThe application for costs against Dr. Tan was dismissed, and Nanyang Law LLC was ordered to pay costs to Dr. Tan (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2011-sghc-117 10 May 2011	10 May 2011	Plaintiff, 1st Defendant	LostApplication for security for costs dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2010-sghc-133 29 Apr 2010	29 Apr 2010	Plaintiff, Respondent	LostAppeal against the decision of the learned assistant registrar was dismissed. The court ordered that the costs order below was to remain and made no order as to costs in the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.