Muhammad Salleh bin Hamid
Muhammad Salleh bin Hamid is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 5 law firms. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 75.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Muhammad Salleh bin Hamid has been represented by 5 law firms and 7 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Bajwa & Co | 1 case |
| Tito Isaac & Co LLP | 1 case |
| S P Wong & Co | 1 case |
| K K Cheng Law LLC | 2 cases |
| KK Cheng Law LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Muhammad Salleh bin Hamid's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 21.0
- Complex Cases
- 6 (75.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 821.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 132.0 parties avg |
| 2024 | 137.0 parties avg |
| 2023 | 137.0 parties avg |
| 2022 | 219.0 parties avg |
| 2021 | 118.0 parties avg |
| 2020 | 23.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Muhammad Salleh bin Hamid's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 8(100.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 15,000.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 1 1 |
| 2024 | 1 1 |
| 2023 | 1 1 |
| 2022 | 1 2 |
| 2021 | 1 1 |
| 2020 | 1 2 |
Case History
Displaying all 8 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
04 Feb 2025 | Applicant | LostApplication dismissed due to lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action. |
26 Mar 2024 | Appellant, Applicant | LostAppeal dismissed due to lack of standing. |
04 Dec 2023 | Applicant | LostApplication dismissed for lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action. |
22 Jun 2022 | Plaintiff | LostCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 May 2022 | Plaintiff | LostCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
01 Dec 2021 | Plaintiff | LostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed. |
22 Nov 2020 | Appellant | LostAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
09 Jan 2020 | Defendant | LostSentenced to the mandatory death penalty. |