MER VUE DEVELOPMENTS PTE LTD

MER VUE DEVELOPMENTS PTE LTD is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 66.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

MER VUE DEVELOPMENTS PTE LTD has been represented by 2 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	Christopher Chuah Jasmine Low Nikki Ngiam Ng Pei Yin
Wong Partnership LLP	1 case	Christopher Chuah Nikki Ngiam Ng Pei Yin

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of MER VUE DEVELOPMENTS PTE LTD's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.0
Complex Cases: 2 (66.7%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	38.0 parties avg	8.0	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	38.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of MER VUE DEVELOPMENTS PTE LTD's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,500.00	1,750.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 3	Won: 3 cases (300.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2016-sgca-38 12 Jun 2016	12 Jun 2016	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed in favour of the respondent; costs awarded to the respondent.
2	2016-sghc-38 15 Mar 2016	15 Mar 2016	Defendant	WonThe court found that Tiong Aik and RSP were independent contractors of Mer Vue, the DSCs and NSCs were independent contractors of Tiong Aik, Squire Mech and Sitetectonix were independent contractors of RSP, Tiong Aik and RSP had limited statutory non-delegable duties under the Building Control Act with no apparent implications on their independent contractor defenses, RSP had not unreasonably delegated any of its professional duties, Mer Vue, Tiong Aik and RSP had taken proper care in the selection and appointment of their respective independent contractors, and that no private right of action is available to the Plaintiff for the alleged breach of statutory duty by Mer Vue under the BMSMA.
3	2016-sghc-28 01 Mar 2016	01 Mar 2016	Defendant, Respondent	WonAppeal against the dismissal of the Plaintiff's application to amend its pleadings was dismissed; costs of $3,500 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the 1st Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.