Loh Choon Phing Robin

Loh Choon Phing Robin is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 1 counsel. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 66.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Loh Choon Phing Robin has been represented by 1 law firm and 1 counsel.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Independent Practitioner	1 case	Loh Choon Phing Robin

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Loh Choon Phing Robin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 2 (66.7%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	66.7%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Loh Choon Phing Robin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	15,000.00	15,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2018-sghc-195 06 Sep 2018	06 Sep 2018	Defendant	LostDeclared that Robin’s guarantee is valid and enforceable and in the event of non-payment by KK Asia of all or any of the sums set out in [151], that Robin is liable to pay the sum(s) to Forest Fibers.
2	2017-sgca-55 24 Sep 2017	24 Sep 2017	Respondent	LostAppeal allowed in part; interim prohibitory injunction granted; ordered to pay costs of the appeal fixed at $15,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2016-sghc-282 26 Dec 2016	26 Dec 2016	Defendant	WonThe application against the defendant was dismissed.