Lim Lie Hoa
Lim Lie Hoa is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 75.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Lim Lie Hoa has been represented by 4 law firms and 5 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Wee Swee Teow & Co | 2 cases |
Wee Swee Teow and Co | 4 cases |
Tan Kok Quan Partnership | 1 case |
C Arul & Partners | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Lim Lie Hoa's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.1
- Complex Cases
- 6 (75.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 34.3 parties avg |
Other | 13.0 parties avg |
Won | 44.3 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2008 | 15.0 parties avg |
2005 | 24.0 parties avg |
2004 | 25.0 parties avg |
2002 | 33.3 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Lim Lie Hoa's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 3(37.5%) |
Other | 1(12.5%) |
Won | 4(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 200.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2008 | 1 1 |
2005 | 2 11 |
2004 | 1 2 |
2002 | 3 111 |
Case History
Displaying all 8 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
24 Mar 2008 | Defendant | LostDefendant's application for review was dismissed. |
03 May 2005 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs to be paid to Jane Ong. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
18 Jan 2005 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the respondent was dismissed. |
26 Aug 2004 | Respondent, Defendant | WonFirst respondent's application to exclude certain documents from the record of appeal was granted; costs of $400 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
15 Jun 2004 | Defendant | WonFirst defendant's appeal against the AR’s findings as to the amount distributed to the second defendant was dismissed. |
28 Oct 2002 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed in favour of the respondent. |
26 Sep 2002 | Defendant, Third Party | LostApplication to discharge a Mareva injunction imposed by the court was dismissed. |
22 Apr 2002 | Defendant, Third Party | OtherThe first defendant's solicitor was discharged from acting for her. |