Lim Chong Poon

Lim Chong Poon is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Lim Chong Poon has been represented by 5 law firms and 11 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Peter Low & Choo LLC	1 case	Choo Zheng Xi Ng Bin Hong Elaine Low
Straits Law Practice LLC	1 case	N. Sreenivasan SC
Jimmy Yap & Co	1 case	Jimmy Yap
TSMP Law Corporation	1 case	Ong Pei Ching Tan Gim Hai Adrian David Aw Jingwei Yeoh Jean Ann
Heng Leong & Srinivasan	1 case	Srinivasan Namasivayam Rahayu bte Mahzam

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Chong Poon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Chong Poon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2020-sgca-27 29 Mar 2020	29 Mar 2020	Appellant, Plaintiff	LostAppeal dismissed with costs of $30,000 (all-in) to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2017-sghc-196 14 Aug 2017	14 Aug 2017	Plaintiff	DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of contract was dismissed.
3	2013-sghc-126 04 Jul 2013	04 Jul 2013	Defendant	WonEstablished a prima facie case that there was a completely constituted trust for value in his favour, the existence of which was acknowledged by Seeto and Rodney on numerous occasions. Under that trust, he was entitled to 25% of TR’s shareholding subject to a cap of $10m on the paid-up capital of TR.