Lim Ah Poh
Lim Ah Poh is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 17 counsels. Through 7 law firms. Their track record shows a 42.9% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Lim Ah Poh has been represented by 7 law firms and 17 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| TSMP Law Corporation | 2 cases |
| Stamford Law Corporation | 1 case |
| Haq and Selvam | 1 case |
| Drew & Napier LLC | 1 case |
| AsiaLegal LLC | 1 case |
| Central Chambers Law Corporation | 1 case |
| Alice Yeo and Company | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Lim Ah Poh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 9.4
- Complex Cases
- 7 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 39.0 parties avg |
| Partial | 18.0 parties avg |
| Won | 310.3 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 111.0 parties avg |
| 2018 | 19.0 parties avg |
| 2015 | 111.0 parties avg |
| 2012 | 111.0 parties avg |
| 2009 | 18.0 parties avg |
| 2008 | 18.0 parties avg |
| 2004 | 18.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Lim Ah Poh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 3(42.9%) |
| Partial | 1(14.3%) |
| Won | 3(42.9%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 591,270.833 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 1 |
| 2018 | 1 1 |
| 2015 | 1 1 |
| 2012 | 1 1 |
| 2009 | 1 1 |
| 2008 | 1 1 |
| 2004 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 7 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
14 Mar 2019 | Plaintiff | WonCosts of $435,500 awarded for the Four Hearings (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
21 Nov 2018 | Respondent | WonThe respondent was awarded damages in the amount of $1,338,312.50, jointly and severally from the appellants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
05 Aug 2015 | Plaintiff | WonConsent Order set aside. |
11 Nov 2012 | Plaintiff | LostThe plaintiff's action to set aside the Consent Order was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
11 Feb 2009 | Plaintiff | LostPlaintiff's application for a stay of the application was dismissed. |
22 Jun 2008 | Plaintiff | LostThe plaintiffs' application for further orders and/or clarification and/or variation of the consent order was dismissed. |
23 Feb 2004 | Plaintiff | PartialPrayer (1) of SIC 5348 of 2003 was dismissed in so far as the amendment referred to the settlement agreement, but the addition of the prayer that the company be wound up was allowed. Both parties then consented to the amendment of the OS to include a prayer in the alternative that the defendants be ordered to purchase the plaintiff’s shares in the first defendant. |