L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd
L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 3 law firms.
Legal Representation
L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 6 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
J Koh & Co | 2 cases |
Raj Kumar & Rama | 1 case |
Raj Kumar & Ruma | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Dismissed | 12.0 parties avg |
Lost | 52.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2001 | 42.0 parties avg |
2000 | 22.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Dismissed | 1(16.7%) |
Lost | 5(83.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 333.333 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2001 | 1 4 |
2000 | 2 11 |
Case History
Displaying all 6 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
27 Sep 2001 | Plaintiff, Appellant | LostAppeal against the Registrar's directions was dismissed with costs of $500 to be paid to the Defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
27 Sep 2001 | Plaintiff, Appellant | LostAppeal against the Registrar's directions was dismissed with costs of $500 to be paid to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
24 Sep 2001 | Appellant, Defendant | LostThe appeal against the order to set aside security for costs was lost. |
24 Sep 2001 | Appellant, Defendant | LostL&M's appeal was dismissed, and the order for security of costs was set aside. |
10 Aug 2000 | Appellant, Plaintiff | LostAppeal dismissed; L & M's application for a stay of the defendant's counterclaim was denied. |
27 Apr 2000 | Defendant | DismissedDefendant's counterclaim was struck out with liberty to institute fresh proceedings. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |