D

D is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 12 counsels. Through 7 law firms. Their track record shows a 42.9% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 42.9% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

D has been represented by 7 law firms and 12 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Mallal and Namazie	1 case	Tan Teng Muan Deanna Kwok
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Raeza Ibrahim Grace Morgan Mahesh Rai
Rajah Velu & Co	1 case	Thangavelu Shanker
Andrew Tan Tiong Gee & Co	1 case	Andrew Tan
G R Law Corporation	1 case	G Raman
V Ramakrishnan & Co	1 case	V Ramakrishnan
Colin Ng & Partners	1 case	John Thomas Anita Thomas

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of D's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 3 (42.9%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.3 parties avg	3.3	42.9%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	14.3%
Won	33.0 parties avg	3.0	42.9%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of D's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(42.9%)	42.9%
Partial	1(14.3%)	14.3%
Won	3(42.9%)	42.9%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2018-sghcr-9 19 Jun 2018	19 Jun 2018	Defendant	LostApplication for stay of proceedings denied.
2	2013-sghc-138 18 Jul 2013	18 Jul 2013	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed, granting the adoption application.
3	2011-sghc-94 12 Apr 2011	12 Apr 2011	Defendant	WonThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed.
4	2009-sghc-220 27 Sep 2009	27 Sep 2009	Intervener	PartialThe court agreed that the gift had lapsed but disagreed with the 4th Intervener's construction that the lapsed gift passes as on an intestacy. The interveners are to bear their own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2003-sghc-165 30 Jul 2003	30 Jul 2003	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's claims in both Suit 150/2002 (negligence) and Suit 204/2002 (defamation) were dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2002-sghc-210 11 Sep 2002	11 Sep 2002	Defendant	LostThe defendant's application for joint custody of the infant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	2002-sghc-98 01 May 2002	01 May 2002	Respondent	WonThe appeal was allowed and a stay of all proceedings in Divorce Petition No 2792 of 2000 including Summons-in-Chambers No 650813 of 2001 was ordered.