BNP Paribas SA

BNP Paribas SA is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 20.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

BNP Paribas SA has been represented by 1 law firm and 5 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of BNP Paribas SA's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
3.2
Complex Cases
1 (20.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Won53.2 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201823.0 parties avg
201733.3 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of BNP Paribas SA's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Won5(100.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
EUR32,245,591.791 cases
SGD1,166.673 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20181
2
20171
3

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
04 Oct 2018
Applicant, Respondent, PlaintiffWonApplication allowed and the Appeal is deemed to have been withdrawn pursuant to Order 57 Rule 9(4) of the Rules of Court. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14 Mar 2018
PlaintiffWonApplication for a declaration that the action is not an offshore case was allowed. Costs fixed at $3,500, inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16 Nov 2017
PlaintiffWonJudgment for the Plaintiff; the Agams are to pay BNP €13,913,543.12 (in respect of SCI Ruth Agam) and €18,332,048.67 (in respect of Det Internationale), being the amounts due and owing to BNP as at 10 August 2017, plus interest from 10 August 2017 until the date of full payment.
17 May 2017
RespondentWonAppeal dismissed; Appellants to pay the Respondent’s costs of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal itself (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16 Feb 2017
PlaintiffWonBNP Paribas SA substituted as plaintiff.