Yusfiyanto Yatiman

Yusfiyanto Yatiman is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and import and export law. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Import and Export Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel by Convention	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unlicensed moneylending	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Extradition Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Moneylending Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yusfiyanto Yatiman has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yusfiyanto Yatiman has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Lee Pit Chin: Unlicensed Moneylending by Estate Agent(Aug 2013) Wong Yuh Lan v Public Prosecutor: Extradition, Conspiracy to Defraud the US, Export Regulations(Aug 2012)
Straits Law Practice LLC	2 cases	50% of cases	Spandeck Engineering v China Construction: Contractual Terms & Estoppel in Construction Dispute(Dec 2005) China Construction v Spandeck: Lump Sum Contract Dispute in Construction Project(Apr 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yusfiyanto Yatiman's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	50%
Won	33.5 parties avg	3.5	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yusfiyanto Yatiman's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	959,227.14	479,613.572 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Lee Pit Chin: Unlicensed Moneylending by Estate Agent 19 Aug 2013 Lee Pit Chin (Respondent)Lost	19 Aug 2013	Lee Pit Chin (Respondent): Sentence EnhancedThe Respondent's imprisonment term was increased from three months to nine months for each of the two charges, to run concurrently, while the fine of $80,000 (12 weeks’ imprisonment in default) for each charge remains.
2	Wong Yuh Lan v Public Prosecutor: Extradition, Conspiracy to Defraud the US, Export Regulations 06 Aug 2012 Hia Soo Gan Benson (Applicant)Lost	06 Aug 2012	Hia Soo Gan Benson (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for Order for Review of Detention dismissed.
3	Spandeck Engineering v China Construction: Contractual Terms & Estoppel in Construction Dispute 26 Dec 2005 China Construction (South Pacific) Development Co Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	26 Dec 2005	China Construction (South Pacific) Development Co Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent in the sum of $479,613.57. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	China Construction v Spandeck: Lump Sum Contract Dispute in Construction Project 28 Apr 2005 China Construction (South Pacific) Development Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	28 Apr 2005	China Construction (South Pacific) Development Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $479,613.57, less deductions for the defendant's counterclaim (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).