Yeo Yen Ping

Yeo Yen Ping is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and guarantee. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shares	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reverse Takeover	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Court Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Role of court assessors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Invoice Discounting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Payment Undertaking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yeo Yen Ping has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeo Yen Ping has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	6 cases	100% of cases	Full Fledge Holdings Ltd v Wisanggeni Lauw: Contract Formation & Share Transfer Dispute(Jun 2004) Malayan Banking Bhd v Lauw Wisanggeni: Enforcement of Deed of Undertaking & Consideration in Contract Law(Sep 2003) Ng Giok Oh v Sajjad Akhtar: Pre-Action Discovery & Court Assessors' Role in Valuation Dispute(Jul 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeo Yen Ping's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	33.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeo Yen Ping's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	4,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Full Fledge Holdings Ltd v Wisanggeni Lauw: Contract Formation & Share Transfer Dispute 29 Jun 2004 Wisanggeni Lauw (Defendant)Lost	29 Jun 2004	Wisanggeni Lauw (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant ordered to transfer 10,625,000 UFS shares to Bank of China for the account of Kang. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Malayan Banking Bhd v Lauw Wisanggeni: Enforcement of Deed of Undertaking & Consideration in Contract Law 14 Sep 2003 Lauw Wisanggeni (Defendant)Lost	14 Sep 2003	Lauw Wisanggeni (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant's claim that the originating summons ought to be converted to a writ was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ng Giok Oh v Sajjad Akhtar: Pre-Action Discovery & Court Assessors' Role in Valuation Dispute 30 Jul 2002 Philip Leow (Defendant)Won	30 Jul 2002	Philip Leow (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication for pre-action discovery was dismissed; costs of $8,000 awarded against the plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Lee Yong Chuan Edwin v Tan Soan Lian: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Gift of Shares & Maintenance 04 Dec 2000 Lee Yong Chuan Edwin (Appellant)Partial	04 Dec 2000	Lee Yong Chuan Edwin (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding the exclusion of LKTH and LKTI shares from matrimonial assets.
5	Law Society of Singapore v Disciplinary Committee: Kwa Kim Li & Quahe Mei Lin - Professional Conduct & Touting 13 Aug 2000 Kwa Kim Li (Respondent)Won	13 Aug 2000	Kwa Kim Li (Respondent): No cause of sufficient gravity for disciplinary action existsThe Disciplinary Committee determined that no cause of sufficient gravity for disciplinary action existed under s 83 of the Legal Profession Act in respect of Kwa Kim Li, and the High Court agreed.
6	Societe Generale v Statoil Asia Pacific: Payment Confirmation & Invoice Discounting Dispute 19 Apr 2000 Statoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	19 Apr 2000	Statoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs.