Yeo Kim Hai Patrick

Yeo Kim Hai Patrick is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and measure of damages. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and automobile accidents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	7 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	7 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	6 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Negligence	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Double Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collateral Benefits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Government Subsidies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal injuries cases	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Apportionment of Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeo Kim Hai Patrick has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Legal Solutions LLC	5 cases	71% of cases	Lo Kok Jong v Eng Beng: Double Recovery Rule & Government Subsidies in Personal Injury Claims(Aug 2024) CXN v CXO: Negligence and Apportionment of Liability in Car Collision Case(Dec 2022) Lau Keuk Ling v Chan Chun Sheng: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injuries(Mar 2022)
KhattarWong LLP	2 cases	29% of cases	Ng Lay Peng v Gain City: Personal Injury Damages from Traffic Accident(Aug 2018) Tan Shi Lin v Poh Che Thiam: Damages for Personal Injuries from Road Accident(Sep 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeo Kim Hai Patrick's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	43%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	29%
Unknown	14.0 parties avg	4.0	14%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeo Kim Hai Patrick's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Partial	2(29%)	29%
Unknown	1(14%)	14%
Won	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	726,205.54	145,241.115 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Unknown: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lo Kok Jong v Eng Beng: Double Recovery Rule & Government Subsidies in Personal Injury Claims 07 Aug 2024 Lo Kok Jong (Appellant)Won	07 Aug 2024	Lo Kok Jong (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; government subsidies and grants should be deducted from the damages payable. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CXN v CXO: Negligence and Apportionment of Liability in Car Collision Case 12 Dec 2022 Chui Jin Hua Vincent (Defendant)Lost	12 Dec 2022	Chui Jin Hua Vincent (Defendant): Liability apportionedLiability apportioned at 35%.
3	Lau Keuk Ling v Chan Chun Sheng: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injuries 31 Mar 2022 NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited (Intervener)Partial	31 Mar 2022	NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited (Intervener): Intervention partially successfulThe intervener successfully argued against some of the appellant's claims, but was ultimately liable to pay for the damages awarded for personal injury under the Motor Vehicles (Third Party Risks and Compensation) Act.
4	Lau Keuk Ling v Chan Chun Sheng: Damages Assessment for Personal Injuries 28 Jul 2021 Chan Chun Sheng Gary (Defendant)Lost	28 Jul 2021	Chan Chun Sheng Gary (Defendant): Claim partially successfulJudgment against the Defendant; damages awarded to the Plaintiff in the amount of $242,578.64 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Tan You Cheng v Ng Kok Hin: Negligence and Contributory Negligence on the PIE Expressway 12 Nov 2020 Ng Kok Hin (Defendant)Partial	12 Nov 2020	Ng Kok Hin (Defendant): Partial LiabilityDefendant bears 20% liability for the accident. Monetary amount is 0.00 as quantum to be determined at a later stage. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Ng Lay Peng v Gain City: Personal Injury Damages from Traffic Accident 22 Aug 2018 AXA Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd (Intervener)	22 Aug 2018	AXA Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd (Intervener): -
7	Tan Shi Lin v Poh Che Thiam: Damages for Personal Injuries from Road Accident 06 Sep 2017 Poh Che Thiam (Defendant)Lost	06 Sep 2017	Poh Che Thiam (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of $483,626.90 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).