Yap Zhan Ming

Yap Zhan Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and unlicensed moneylending. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	4 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non-disclosure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unlicensed moneylending	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yap Zhan Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yap Zhan Ming has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Salem Ibrahim LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	SW Trustees v. Teodros Ashenafi: Amendment Application, Conspiracy, Limitation Act(Sep 2023) Kroll v Cyberdyne Tech Exchange: Minority Oppression Claim & Pleadings(Aug 2023) SW Trustees v. Tesemma: Security for Costs Application in Liquidation(May 2023)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Ochroid Trading v Chua Siok Lui: Unenforceability of Loan Agreements due to Illegal Moneylending(Mar 2017)
CLASIS LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Pacific Prime v Lee Suet Fern: Injunction Variation for Misuse of Confidential Information(Apr 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yap Zhan Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.1
Complex Cases: 5 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	36.0 parties avg	6.0	60%
Partial	26.2 parties avg	6.2	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2023	36.7 parties avg	6.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yap Zhan Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Partial	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	SW Trustees v. Teodros Ashenafi: Amendment Application, Conspiracy, Limitation Act 28 Sep 2023 Farooq Ahmad Mann (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Sep 2023	Farooq Ahmad Mann (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedPlaintiffs' application to amend the Statement of Claim was denied.
2	Kroll v Cyberdyne Tech Exchange: Minority Oppression Claim & Pleadings 01 Aug 2023 Lily Hong Yingli (Defendant)Partial	01 Aug 2023	Lily Hong Yingli (Defendant): Application for further and better particulars allowed in partApplication for further and better particulars allowed in part. No monetary amount awarded. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	SW Trustees v. Tesemma: Security for Costs Application in Liquidation 30 May 2023 Farooq Ahmad Mann (Plaintiff)Partial	30 May 2023	Farooq Ahmad Mann (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part to the extent that the first defendant is entitled to security for costs in respect of the costs of trial and post-trial work.
4	Pacific Prime v Lee Suet Fern: Injunction Variation for Misuse of Confidential Information 17 Apr 2022 CXA Insurance Brokers Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Apr 2022	CXA Insurance Brokers Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application to discharge injunction dismissedThe plaintiff's application to discharge the non-solicitation injunctions and the confidentiality injunctions was dismissed.
5	Ochroid Trading v Chua Siok Lui: Unenforceability of Loan Agreements due to Illegal Moneylending 21 Mar 2017 Ole Prytz Rasmussen (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Mar 2017	Ole Prytz Rasmussen (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, fraudulent misrepresentation and conspiracy to defraud was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.