Yang Shi Yong

Yang Shi Yong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in revenue law and income taxation.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yang Shi Yong has demonstrated expertise across 5 primary practice areas, with significant experience in revenue law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Revenue Law	3 cases	38% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Yang Shi Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 38% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	25% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yang Shi Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Yang Shi Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Yang Shi Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yang Shi Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yang Shi Yong has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Comptroller of Income Tax v VJ: Interpretation of Section 10E Income Tax Act for Property Letting Business(Nov 2008) Pan-United Marine v Chief Assessor: Property Tax on Floating Dry Docks(May 2008)
Ong Sim Ho	1 cases	33% of cases	MCST Plan Nos 1298 & 1304 v Chief Assessor: Property Tax on Common Property in Shopping Centre(Aug 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yang Shi Yong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yang Shi Yong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Comptroller of Income Tax v VJ: Interpretation of Section 10E Income Tax Act for Property Letting Business 30 Nov 2008 VJ (Respondent)Lost	30 Nov 2008	VJ (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the decision of the Income Tax Board of Review was dismissed.
2	Pan-United Marine v Chief Assessor: Property Tax on Floating Dry Docks 19 May 2008 Pan-United Marine Ltd (Appellant)Lost	19 May 2008	Pan-United Marine Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	MCST Plan Nos 1298 & 1304 v Chief Assessor: Property Tax on Common Property in Shopping Centre 31 Aug 2006 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan Nos 1298 and 1304 (Appellant)Lost	31 Aug 2006	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan Nos 1298 and 1304 (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.