Wong Yoong Phin

Wong Yoong Phin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in divorce and family law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Settlement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Title	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Loss	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Postnuptial Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loss of Rent	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wong Yoong Phin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wong Yoong Phin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Yoong Phin & Co	5 cases	83% of cases	AOO v AON: Appeal on Ancillary Order - Consent vs Default Judgment & Division of Matrimonial Assets(Sep 2011) Fongsoon Engineering v Kensteel Engineering: Sub-Contract Works Dispute(Apr 2011) AON v AOO: Setting Aside Ancillary Orders in Divorce Proceedings(Jan 2011)
Wong Yoong Phin and Co	1 cases	17% of cases	LK Ang Construction v Chubb Singapore: Offer to Settle & Cost Implications(Oct 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wong Yoong Phin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Partial	33.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wong Yoong Phin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Partial	3(50%)	50%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	356,177.81	89,044.454 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AOO v AON: Appeal on Ancillary Order - Consent vs Default Judgment & Division of Matrimonial Assets 28 Sep 2011 AON (Respondent)Lost	28 Sep 2011	AON (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $5,000 awarded to the wife. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Fongsoon Engineering v Kensteel Engineering: Sub-Contract Works Dispute 05 Apr 2011 Kensteel Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	05 Apr 2011	Kensteel Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant in the sum of $8,645.55. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	AON v AOO: Setting Aside Ancillary Orders in Divorce Proceedings 19 Jan 2011 AON (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	19 Jan 2011	AON (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; the Ancillary Order was restored.
4	Cheng Fu Zay v Management Corp: Loss of Rent Due to Negligence in Condo Common Roof Maintenance 13 Apr 2008 Lai Foong Har (Plaintiff)Partial	13 Apr 2008	Lai Foong Har (Plaintiff): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part regarding loss of rent. Damages for loss of rent awarded in the amount of $171,266.13 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	LK Ang Construction v Chubb Singapore: Offer to Settle & Cost Implications 28 Oct 2003 Chubb Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	28 Oct 2003	Chubb Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial WinPlaintiff failed on the breach of contract claim. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	L.K. Ang Construction v Chubb Singapore: Sub-Contract Formation & Defamation 17 Dec 2002 Chubb Singapore Private Limited (Defendant)Partial	17 Dec 2002	Chubb Singapore Private Limited (Defendant): Action fails on breach of contract, succeeds in part on qualified privilege for libelThe defendant won the breach of contract claim, but lost in part on the defamation claim. The defence of qualified privilege succeeded with regard to the publication to the architect, employer, M&E consultant, but not for publication to the quantity surveyor. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.