Violet Netto

Violet Netto is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contempt of court and scandalising the court.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Violet Netto has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Violet Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Violet Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Violet Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Violet Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Violet Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the court	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Violet Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Violet Netto has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
L F Violet Netto	1 cases	50% of cases	Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie v National University of Singapore: Breach of Contract, Torts, and Discovery Dispute(Nov 2014)
M Ravi & Co	1 cases	50% of cases	Attorney-General v Chee Soon Juan: Contempt of Court for Scandalizing Judiciary(Mar 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Violet Netto's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Violet Netto's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	7,500.00	3,750.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie v National University of Singapore: Breach of Contract, Torts, and Discovery Dispute 20 Nov 2014 Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Nov 2014	Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie (Plaintiff): Application DismissedOriginating Summons dismissed with costs fixed at $1,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Attorney-General v Chee Soon Juan: Contempt of Court for Scandalizing Judiciary 30 Mar 2006 Chee Soon Juan (Respondent)Lost	30 Mar 2006	Chee Soon Juan (Respondent): Order of committal grantedFound guilty of contempt of court and sentenced to one day in jail and a fine of $6,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore), with seven days' imprisonment in default of payment.